BEAR Trap of Century - HA!!
#11
Posted 17 August 2009 - 01:19 PM
#12
Posted 17 August 2009 - 01:43 PM
stickan,
Nice post. The work by Sergej Tarasovs at timingsolutions is most interesting. [img]http://img229
The work he is doing is not only interesting, it's most impressive. And the software is developing under your eyes. On the forum someone súggests something and within a week the software is updated sometimes the next day.
It's only possible because it's a one man job and the work of a very dedicated and extremly intellignet person and with talent in so many different fields of technical analysis. I am soo impressed.
If you have the theoretical back ground, you can do anything with this software.
And if you don't much is automated and simplified and he's got articles on everything.
So you will also learn a lot using it.
I have no interest in the software or his company I am just a satisfied customer.
I will try to post some more in the future.
Stickan, plan a trip to my office in later September and I will show you something better...
The only difference is we are not developing a software to sell but for our own clients and funds...
I don't believe in selling a retail software for trading purposes, you are effectively killing any edge the software may ever have.
Best,
-arb
#13
Posted 17 August 2009 - 01:47 PM
#14
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:49 PM
stickan,
Nice post. The work by Sergej Tarasovs at timingsolutions is most interesting. [img]http://img229
The work he is doing is not only interesting, it's most impressive. And the software is developing under your eyes. On the forum someone súggests something and within a week the software is updated sometimes the next day.
It's only possible because it's a one man job and the work of a very dedicated and extremly intellignet person and with talent in so many different fields of technical analysis. I am soo impressed.
If you have the theoretical back ground, you can do anything with this software.
And if you don't much is automated and simplified and he's got articles on everything.
So you will also learn a lot using it.
I have no interest in the software or his company I am just a satisfied customer.
I will try to post some more in the future.
Stickan, plan a trip to my office in later September and I will show you something better...
The only difference is we are not developing a software to sell but for our own clients and funds...
I don't believe in selling a retail software for trading purposes, you are effectively killing any edge the software may ever have.
Best,
-arb
Arbman,
I don't agree.
Most people don't know what they don't know, hence they cannot use a software like yours or Sergeyjs. there are so many "solutions " out there and there is no holy grail. so even if Sergej developed the software that would solve all the problems of trading 99% of the worlds population wouldn't know how to make money out of it.
We have to remember - it's not the software, or the analysis that makes money it's the person who uses it who does.
Timing slution for example can never be automated. It can only be used by the handful of traders, that can use the full potential, hence it will never have great influence on the stockmarket. And if you understand the core of the software which is from the beginning astrological (it has moved over to cyclical - but they are interrelated, so it's natural), you also understand that there is not much you can do - long term - about influencing the stockmarket movements. Most of us sits on a "secret" that makes us money and we thing that if we give it away it will destroy the market - it is not true.
I have been sharing my "secrets" in denmark an d sweden on dsicussion forums and I would estimate that about 2% of theose who read my analyses understands what I am saying and pehaps 1% beievs it and half of those who believs in it will act on it. I have come to the opinion that it is not knowledge that moves markets, but emotions and money. Hence it's risk free to share ones secrets.
A good exmple is Thimothy Morge http://marketgeometry.com/ who re-invented the Pitchfork (Median lines) and educated people for free many years in the late 90ties and the beginning of 2000 - the sharpest tool in technical analysis and actually the only tool you need to make money. It didn't change anything. Today, still, most people have not heard about it. Another secret that does not make inpact on the market but makes money to the people that uses it.
Besides, when the masses flock around stockcharts.com and 100s of oscillators and believe that it is the solution on how to make money I cannot imagine another software like Sergejs will change anyting.
I don't believe in selling a retail software for trading purposes, you are effectively killing any edge the software may ever have.
Also, it depends on what you want to do - sell software or trade. Any of those choices may make you a millionaire - again - it depends on who we are and what we want to do with our lives....
But I would love to come by you office, send me an email to stickans@gmail.com and tell me where to go - not September - November is a much better month to travel....
I might show up
#15
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:25 PM
#16
Posted 17 August 2009 - 05:22 PM
#17
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:50 PM
Stickan,
Nice work as others have said, I am curious about the 5 most prominent cycles using advanced matt an fourier analysis chart. Does the amplitude mean anything? Several charts of yours are projecting possible bottoming action around late fall, but it looks as if the March bottom does not break.
Can you clarify on whether the time/cycle analysis suggests the March bottom breaks or not. My stuff seems to entirely agree with the prospect, along with the fact that August 2009 is an important top. I just cannot figure out, granted its not crucial, what kind of bottom to expect in the upcoming months.
From what I posted on cycles, Sergey's chart's don't discuss amplitude and I have not found information on the turbocycle either, but this is what he writes in an article (my bold marking):
Weighting: In the previous example the same weights were used for all three cycles. Imagine that you know that one of the cycles is more important than others. You can assign to that cycle double meaning (same period, same phase, double amplitude). It leads to a different appearance of the resulting curve. Thus, playing with cycle weights we can significantly improve our superposition curve.
But he also writes
MESA - cycles in dynamics:
The most common misunderstanding regarding MESA is the statement that MESA allows to calculate cycles more accurately. This is not true. MESA allows to observe how the cycles live, how they appear - grow - disappear. Usually cycles live not too long except the fundamental cycles such as Annual and business cycles. The cycle's life is similar to success of some pop music artists: after some glorious time (because their music is in tune with some public emotion) they are forgotten by general public A very similar thing happens to the cycles: the cycle appears, then it becomes a leading cycle on the market, then other cycles appear, and that leading cycle becomes a memory....We need to accept this fact no matter it is convenient for us or not. The latest most powerful cycle is called a DOMINANT cycle. Pay attention to the LATEST. This method helps us to switch our focus from searching some Magic Cycle that works forever to investigation of dominant cycles. We need to catch them as early as possible, while it is still active in the chaotic waves of the stock market ocean.
Thus we do not know if the bottom of the cycle you asked about is as important then as it is now. Hence we don't know about the ampltude and not if it is lower then the march low.
But check THIS out!
I used the spectrum module to specifically track the 6 most important cycles between 1928 and 2009
In the upper right corner you can see the length of the cycle and how amplitude weight is divided among cycles in the composite cycle.
Since these cycles are dominant now - I presume that march low will be broken - interpreted from this chart.
But what strikes me is how ALL cycles start moving down at the top of the pricechart - in 2007!
And that they will do so until "2" in 2011.
If that is true - breaking the march low, will be the least of our problems.
#18
Posted 17 August 2009 - 07:23 PM
-Scott O'Neil (son of William O'Neil), Portfolio Manager at O’Neil Data Systems, when asked where the Dow would go in the coming months
#19
Posted 17 August 2009 - 08:56 PM
#20
Posted 18 August 2009 - 01:47 AM
The richest rich is not dumb, they would not be rich otherwise, if they ever find that an idea is catching up, they do let it run for a while until they position themselves to profit handsomely. It is better to not give your edge to the masses, it will eventually stop working...
But I would love to come by you office, send me an email to stickans@gmail.com and tell me where to go - not September - November is a much better month to travel....
I might show up flowers.gif
I have a few new potential clients, most of our capacity is filled up by a few accredited or institutional clients, I will email you... Thanks for the interest.
Edited by arbman, 18 August 2009 - 01:47 AM.