Jump to content



Photo

"Fukushima Forecast: Massive radiation cloud nearing California on April 11 (VIDEO)."...


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#21 fib_1618

fib_1618

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,144 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 11:45 AM

Hey Mark...just when are you going to end this absurdity and put these non technical posts to the Health and Sanity board for those who wish to immerse themselves in this non market related, blow by blow, environmental banter? Fib

Better to ignore me than abhor me.

“Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it” - Benjamin Franklin

 

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw

 

Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices, false claims and promises in order to gain power.

Technical Watch Subscriptions



 


#22 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 12:08 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Canada: Local official advising residents not to drink rainwater after tests find increasing radioactivity — Under pressure from Gov't to stop testing April 8th, 2011 at 12:41 PM." The report explains:

Old Massett Posts Rainwater Advisory, CFNR, April 7, 2011:

The Acting Band Manager for Old Massett has advised area residents not to drink rainwater because of concern about radiation from Japan.

John Disney says the village has been conducting its own tests for radiation in water sources since late March.

While the March 24th sample showed only background radiation levels, later tests showed increased levels of iodine 131 prompting the advisory. …

He says he has experienced pressure from government authorities to stop the testing, but he says he can't do that when the health of the community is at stake.

Disney adds that many elders in the community like to make their tea with rainwater and others have rainwater systems that supply their homes. …

Read the report here.

Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#23 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 03:12 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews, "NY Times anonymous source: "Extremely radioactive material continues to ooze out" of No. 2 reactor vessel — "Leak is likely to widen with time" (DIAGRAM) April 8th, 2011 at 03:05 PM." The report furtheer explains:

Powerful Aftershock Complicates Japan's Nuclear Efforts, New York Times, April 7, 2011:

Posted Image NYT

… At No. 2, extremely radioactive material continues to ooze out of the reactor pressure vessel, and the leak is likely to widen with time, a western nuclear executive asserted.

"It's a little like pulling a thread out of your tie," said the executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect business connections in Japan. "Any breach gets bigger."

Flashes of extremely intense radioactivity have become a serious problem, he said. Tokyo Electric's difficulties in providing accurate information on radiation are not a result of software problems, as some Japanese officials have suggested, but stem from damage to measurement instruments caused by radiation, the executive said. …

Read the report here.


Bob-C

Edited by Bob-C, 08 April 2011 - 03:17 PM.

Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#24 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 03:20 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Radiation level quadruples over two day period in water north of Fukushima (VIDEO) April 8th, 2011 at 03:44 PM." The report states:

Water radiation levels rise north of nuke plant, NHK, April 8, 2011:

The operator of the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant says seawater radiation levels continue to rise in areas north of the plant.

Tokyo Electric Power Company says it detected on Thursday 110 becquerels of radioactive iodine-131 per cubic centimeter in seawater samples collected 30 meters from outlets in the northern part of the complex.

The figure is 2,800 times higher than the maximum allowed under government standards. Measurements at the same spot were 600 times the standard on Tuesday and 1,000 times on Wedneday [sic]. …

Read the report and watch video here.


Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#25 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 04:55 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Gundersen on CNN: “Flaw” in No. 2 containment — It’s a race against time… Now paying the price for adding saltwater (VIDEO)April 8th, 2011 at 05:26 PM." See the explanatory video here.

Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#26 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 08 April 2011 - 07:24 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Nuclear Radiologist: Don’t be fooled by paid industry 'consultants' — Low doses of ionizing radiation do cause cancerApril 8th, 2011 at 07:11 PM." The report explains:

Don’t be fooled by the spin: radiation is bad, Sydney Morning Herald, April 8, 2011:

Dr Peter Karamoskos is a nuclear radiologist and a public representative on the radiation health committee of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency

… There seems to be a never-ending cabal of paid industry scientific ”consultants” who are more than willing to state the fringe view that low doses of ionising radiation do not cause cancer and, indeed, that low doses are actually good for you and lessen the incidence of cancer. …

Ionising radiation is a known carcinogen. This is based on almost 100 years of cumulative research including 60 years of follow-up of the Japanese atom bomb survivors. The International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC, linked to the World Health Organisation) classifies it as a Class 1 carcinogen, the highest classification indicative of certainty of its carcinogenic effects.

In 2006, the US National Academy of Sciences released its Biological Effects of Ionising Radiation (VII) report, which focused on the health effects of radiation doses at below 100 millisieverts. This was a consensus review that assessed the world’s scientific literature on the subject at that time. It concluded: “. . . there is a linear dose-response relationship between exposure to ionising radiation and the development of solid cancers in humans. It is unlikely that there is a threshold below which cancers are not induced.”

The most comprehensive study of nuclear workers by the IARC, involving 600,000 workers exposed to an average cumulative dose of 19mSv, showed a cancer risk consistent with that of the A-bomb survivors. …

Read the report here.


Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#27 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 09 April 2011 - 10:28 AM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Radiation skyrockets to 100 Sv/hr at Fukushima reactor No. 1, along with sudden rise in temperature immediately after 7.4 quake April 9th, 2011 at 06:25 AM." The report explains:

TEPCO steps up effort to remove contaminated water, NHK, April 9, 2011:

[Emphasis Added]

… The plant operator says a strong aftershock on Thursday night did not damage any facilities of the compound, but the surface temperature of the Number 1 reactor rose sharply immediately after the tremor that hit northeastern Japan minutes before midnight.

The reading stood at 223 degrees Celsius at 7 PM, but it rose nearly 40 degrees just after the quake. The temperature had fallen back to 240 degrees at 6 AM on Saturday.

TEPCO says it will continue close monitoring as what caused the sudden rise in temperature is not known. …

Read the report and watch the video here.



The report further explains:

In addition to a sharp rise in temperature after Thursday's quake, the radiation dose appears to shoot off the chart at the No. 1 reactor dry well between April 7 and 8.

The radiation dosage either reached the chart's 100 sieverts per hour limit exactly or it exceeded the chart's maximum range by an unknown amount.

Until April 7, the chart shows the radiation dose remained relatively stable throughout the crisis.

Chart published by Japan's Ministry of Education at http://atmc.jp/plant/rad/

Posted Image

See also:

Nuclear Expert: Periodic nuclear fissions happening in part of No. 1′s reactor core — "Inadvertent criticality" (VIDEO)

Professor at Kyoto University's nuclear institute changes mind: I've started to think fission has happened again at No. 1… re-criticality

Report on neutron beams — Has reactor No. 1 at Fukushima gone "critical"?


Cheers, :)

Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#28 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 09 April 2011 - 08:07 PM

Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "TEPCO now investigating possible leak from reactor No. 3 — Only one that uses plutonium (VIDEO)April 9th, 2011 at 12:49 PM." The report states:[quote]

Bob-C
Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.

#29 jack

jack

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 907 posts

Posted 10 April 2011 - 02:13 AM

Masset was North America's listening post for Russsian subs for decades. High tech low frequency pulse.
Very long range. Full military base just down the road from Haida Village Old Masset. Gazillions spent,
you would think a few radiation sensors would fit in the budget.

In the 70s the plywood trimaraners could sail to Charlottes (now Haida Gwaii) from Hawaii very quickly.
What's blowing in those winds these days. Seems one of the obvious places to sniff North America's onshore flow.
So of course the only Canadian radiation sensor on the north coast was removed March 25 2011




Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Canada: Local official advising residents not to drink rainwater after tests find increasing radioactivity — Under pressure from Gov't to stop testing April 8th, 2011 at 12:41 PM." The report explains:

Old Massett Posts Rainwater Advisory, CFNR, April 7, 2011:

The Acting Band Manager for Old Massett has advised area residents not to drink rainwater because of concern about radiation from Japan.

John Disney says the village has been conducting its own tests for radiation in water sources since late March.

While the March 24th sample showed only background radiation levels, later tests showed increased levels of iodine 131 prompting the advisory. …

He says he has experienced pressure from government authorities to stop the testing, but he says he can't do that when the health of the community is at stake.

Disney adds that many elders in the community like to make their tea with rainwater and others have rainwater systems that supply their homes. …

Read the report here.

Bob-C


Edited by jack, 10 April 2011 - 02:15 AM.


#30 Bob-C

Bob-C

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 5,316 posts

Posted 10 April 2011 - 04:42 AM

Masset was North America's listening post for Russsian subs for decades. High tech low frequency pulse.
Very long range. Full military base just down the road from Haida Village Old Masset. Gazillions spent,
you would think a few radiation sensors would fit in the budget.

In the 70s the plywood trimaraners could sail to Charlottes (now Haida Gwaii) from Hawaii very quickly.
What's blowing in those winds these days. Seems one of the obvious places to sniff North America's onshore flow.
So of course the only Canadian radiation sensor on the north coast was removed March 25 2011




Hi everyone, according to a report from enenews.com, "Canada: Local official advising residents not to drink rainwater after tests find increasing radioactivity — Under pressure from Gov't to stop testing April 8th, 2011 at 12:41 PM." The report explains:

Old Massett Posts Rainwater Advisory, CFNR, April 7, 2011:

The Acting Band Manager for Old Massett has advised area residents not to drink rainwater because of concern about radiation from Japan.

John Disney says the village has been conducting its own tests for radiation in water sources since late March.

While the March 24th sample showed only background radiation levels, later tests showed increased levels of iodine 131 prompting the advisory. …

He says he has experienced pressure from government authorities to stop the testing, but he says he can't do that when the health of the community is at stake.

Disney adds that many elders in the community like to make their tea with rainwater and others have rainwater systems that supply their homes. …

Read the report here.

Bob-C


Hi Jack, good to hear from you. Thanks a lot for the information and your comments and analysis. :)

Best,

Bob

Edited by Bob-C, 10 April 2011 - 04:42 AM.

Disclaimer: None of my posts are meant to be taken as investment advice or trading advice. Do your own due diligence and consult your financial advisor before making any trades or investments.