time and time again when it comes to explaining yourself, you are not relevant until after multiple request to explain yourself.
remember back, when i answered you with the same inadequacy 3 or 4 times how frustrated you became ?
I have no idea what you're talking about, but I do know that you are one of many that posts charts and conveniently block out the settings.
And then when someone dares to ask, you are nowhere to be seen...or you "move on".
To explain myself? Like all so many who make "drive by" posts and never respond to questions asked?
I don't have to explain myself, but I do give specific replies to specific questions
when it comes to technical analysis.
And if I don't, maybe I missed it, or maybe, just maybe, I've been just too busy to come back to the board to look for it. Unlike others, I don't live here on the board. I do have a life outside of providing analytical input to those who may ask questions either directly or indirectly.
So here you go Dev...here's your
opportunity...ask as many questions as you wish and I will give you full and detailed answers. I will make time for you.
Oh...and by the way, since we're taking off our gloves here, your use of the "cumulative NASDAQ McClellan Oscillator" is, IN FACT
, the NASDAQ McClellan Summation Index. So it might be better served if you use the proper reference in your analysis.
P.S. And if any of the moderators close this thread, I'm gone...for good.