Thoughts on Averaging Down
#21
Posted 29 July 2004 - 03:31 PM
Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
http://wallstreetsen...t.com/trial.htm
You can now follow me on twitter
#22
Posted 29 July 2004 - 04:31 PM
#23
Posted 29 July 2004 - 08:39 PM
I think Mark is right on with his trend indicator suggestion. You want the larger, prevailing trend on your side, and if it's not that way, you had best be objectively taken out of the market or pass on the trade.
Lots of good points have been made here. I think you indeed have to control your risk, and if the NDX being down 10% means you're risking 60% of your account, then that's no good. Some would say risk no more than 2%. Personally, I'm a "selective plunger," and I'd go 6% or 8%, sometimes, but also would couple it with a strategy to add to your position as the market moves in your favor.
Not pyramiding, but perhaps something like adding half your original position when the market goes in your favor, twice or three times its normal daily range above your entry, or just picking a percentage as with the downside rules. Add more as the market goes your way.
Let's say we've been in a bull market, and your trend indicators say it's still a bull, though we're getting a pullback. I'd look for chart patterns -- three-wave moves down, bear flags, pennants, "failure swings," etc., and look for Fibonacci retracements as well.
If the NDX has just made a 100 point move up, then for it to go back down 38, 50, or 62 points would be in line with how markets work, quite often, and if we get down 60, for example's sake, and that's where the 5% level is, then great -- a reversal upwards from that area would be expected anyway, per Fibonacci.
The 5% and 10% levels would rarely match up well though, IMO, and I wouldn't go with those percentages, necessarily. I'd go with the Fibonacci retracements in the beginning. If we went up 100, and the market goes down 38 and turns higher, buy (especially if we declined in three waves or if the market looks like it traced out a corrective move down). I'd be willing to add longs at down 50 and even at down 62, as long as our hard science/mathematics trend indicator still says "bull."
If we go as low as down 62 and we're buying, I'd have a hard stop at down 68 or so. Might even buy at down 79, too, with all the above caveats (78.6% is another Fibonacci ratio) with a stop at ~ down 82. Selling the DJIA after a 78.6% rally, compared to a prior decline, has been fantastic since the 2000 top.
I don't know if historically the NDX tends to turn around after declines of 5% and 10%, so I favor the Fibo ratios of prior moves, not percentages of market value. I've seen the ratios work countless times.
Okay, enough.
Best,
Doug
#24
Posted 30 July 2004 - 12:30 AM
#25
Posted 30 July 2004 - 07:31 AM
#26
Posted 30 July 2004 - 07:47 AM
Contrary... I offer the opinion that conventional wisdom about "not trying to pick tops and bottoms" is wrong.TS,
You made some great points. I really like the idea of waiting for a reversal before buying back in, that's a great idea. I'm going to see if I can modify the system and only buy after an x% reversal (say 1 or 2%).
SSB
If you play for tops/bottoms, you at least know quickly whether your trade is probably wrong. Stop out, no averaging against.
"I made 10 times more money trying to pick tops and bottoms than I ever did NOT trying to pick tops and bottoms" --- Paul Tudor Jones
(I too, as a matter of fact)
Hose
#27
Posted 30 July 2004 - 11:29 AM
#28
Posted 30 July 2004 - 11:34 AM
IF you are going to try to pick tops and bottoms, you need to be right on top of the action as best you can.Hose, I don't have anything against picking tops and bottoms if it works for you. Waiting for a reversal can increase your odds of success, but at the expense of a good chunk of the price move - it's always a tradeoff! But no matter which way, I agree with you completely about stopping out rather than averaging against. Good trading, TS.
Many traders want to wait for "confirmation" of the turn. I would argue that there is not such thing as confirmation.
#29
Posted 30 July 2004 - 11:44 AM
#30
Posted 30 July 2004 - 11:52 AM