3 bulls to 11 bears? so is this the time for the turn that Mark suggests could be, based on ability of the board to get it right at turns? Or do we need to see 1 to 13 or 0 to 14? ( I'm not putting words in Mark's mouth, just posing the question, "Is this enough bearishness here to call a turn?") I saw a lot of shorting and liquidation yesterday (how does that happen and yet the market advance?). We are so afraid sometimes of all-time highs.
My analysis suggests the poll reflects the feeling out there in the trading and investing community that this rally cannot last, which aids me in my decision to hold my long positions. I am intrigued by the idea of levels of resistance when we are hitting ATH's. this site consists of experienced traders, so we should get it right at turning points, but how many bears is enough and how many are just a good fade?
I cast my vote with the minority. Maybe all the bears get vindicated today, but I imagine they weren't all long up until this morning's opening and did not enter their short positions at the market on opening, so they have missed out on a wonderful advance, and as I have written before, if I miss a good move, as I have often done and will certainly do again in the near future, I can never get that opportunity back.
Some will say the sample is too small to have any relevance, but Mark (Oexchaos), whom we universally recognize as a very smart guy (trade against him at great risk), obviously believes it is worthwhile, otherwise he wouldn't have it posted. It is a minor indicator to me, but I believe it is helpful and supports my analysis from other indicators that this rally is widely disbelieved.
I would love to see a one year chart of the FF sample against a backdrop of the indices. I believe that a chart of the FF poll for the last 12 months would show the FF poll to be better as a contrary indicator and that I would do better following the lead of the mom and pop investors at AAII than following the lead of the FF poll. Perhaps someone has this charted to prove me wrong.