3 replies to this topic

[AChartist]

a standard cycle is the 2nd presidential low as shown,

it may be they can only have it rising again for reelection if was oversold for first two years, that

is the basis of standard 2nd presidential year low cycle.

The only thing that can actually change anything in two years is closing irs - federal reserve,

anything else will just be another communist ponzie.

the peak of 2022-23 can be quite high some say 125,000 DOW

at least 40,000 Dow is a double. It generally doesn't do anything for people, its globalist

mind control so they can tax 401ks.

The 2008 planned crash was to force former white trash middle class to exhaust 401k at

50% tax with penalty.

but many like Armstrong says lights out after the 2023 peak.

because of the up cycle and two support lines it will probably be up and down

without really going anywhere until the 2nd presidential low in 2 years

is a more significant general correction, that slingshots up into the 2023 high.

 

I think stocks generally get support above the two dotted support lines

from capital flows out of collapsing communist debt. It will probably end up looking like

a bullish inverse head and shoulders over two years.

And holding some capital back to buy stocks in 2 years can work, that capital can

come out of gold or bitcoin holdings for example.

I will build up cost averaging into stock accounts 401k and equity annuity

for two years but the keypoint is

to remember to sell completely out in 2023 whatever that means, exchange for what?

 

The more important thing to do with money may be bitcoin and metals so all things in

diversification. If bitcoin and gold are up a lot in 2 years can be some capital to buy stocks

in the 2nd presidential year low. But I generally think the support lines are there and wont

be scared in corrections just keep cost averaging.

 

 

I dont know how to post charts yet, it will be here in 6 years to see what it looked like.

 

 

http://i1129.photobu...zpsgq2fgezz.png

 

(Rogerdodger edit)I took the liberty to copy and paste your chart using postimage.org ;-)

 

Edited by Rogerdodger, 31 December 2016 - 01:28 PM.

[q4wer]

thanks for sharing,  your chart looks like a very bullish trend ending on year of 2023.  And you are neutral for the next two years.

[AChartist]

I am neg now for 3-4 months then see that up cycle is there can keep pulling it up the weekly RUT is my shorter term schedule. I still have to if there is any new ideas from mnthly SP that I use too

[AChartist]

I dont know if I will make a lot of money in stocks in 6 years, if going into it with this opinion and coming out right with the

 

wind at my back is a good chance vs the usual mistakes of looking around every corner for a crash, taking small gains too

 

early, all those mistakes comes down to commitment to the bias. I think in two years I'll find the top relative strength stocks, leverage gains up and let it run.

 

So far I was right, which goes against armstrong somewhat not to marry up to stocks yet and build up the metals first.

 

The stocks really have sucked for a while now and still to this date, a lot of damage Dow price means nothing to people.

 

So I do things on my own account alright and can even beat Armstrong on some points.

 

But the other retirement plan that can work is the gold stocks as by my gold cycles look good for 5 years and should be a

 

big part of this as we look at sector compositions gold mining can be a big capitalization potential to drive the index.

 

What else do we know, stocks top with interest rates, so that 2023 would be the spot to switch from equity annuity to fixed

 

interest annuity. I am hoping that 6 years is when I retire on this plan and have to organize alot of things around that like

 

a paid house by then, or count on making it in the stock mkt and paying the house at the end is a better use of the capital,

 

a lot to consider. But then the other part, to depend on fixed income 

 

interest rate depends on a working safe country, it might not be US by then, I may need a mexican or chinese investment.

 

We'll see what Armstrongs ideas are by then about global capital. I should be subscribing with him soon he has a couple

 

different levels available I'll start out with a lower end service and see if it enough. 6 years will put me at age 64 about all I

 

can take of this considering the pain I'm taking for the last 5 years running the whole world on my shoulders because

 

they destroyed the country and laid everyone off a couple times leaving me holding the bag.

Edited by AChartist, 31 December 2016 - 04:40 PM.