Jump to content



Photo

DPZ parabolic arch failure


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 opinionated

opinionated

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 4,937 posts

Posted 15 October 2017 - 08:11 AM

Been learning watching DPZ and it meets the failure criteria, 

 

https://blog.stocktw...es-a732cc750c2b

 

Not a recomendation but something for the radar... Personally I am playing it this way I will wait for the test up to 195 level and short there probably two weeks out. Will target the 180's....  I get this from a 30 min chart.

 

Shared TOS Chart

 

http://tos.mx/X642sP

 

 



#2 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 15 October 2017 - 09:53 AM

Been learning watching DPZ and it meets the failure criteria, 

 

https://blog.stocktw...es-a732cc750c2b

 

Not a recomendation but something for the radar... Personally I am playing it this way I will wait for the test up to 195 level and short there probably two weeks out. Will target the 180's....  I get this from a 30 min chart.

 

Shared TOS Chart

 

http://tos.mx/X642sP

 

 

7 years ago....   http://www.siliconin...&srchtxt=bubble



#3 opinionated

opinionated

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 4,937 posts

Posted 16 October 2017 - 06:16 PM

Interesting Don,

 

Yes agree 100%  I was part of the group that just kept shorting all the way up and throwing money out the window! I also believe you when you say where we are now....  It will only be luck that makes a ST swing lower pay off. We are going higher my stuff says 2650 next stop, fib threw out 2800 I think....  That is why I am looking else where.  As I have posted I got out of gold,  Expecting a pullback to just about where we are today. Think we will bounce around here this week and next week off to the races. BUT the sticky wicket is the dollar, Did it, is it making an inverted HS?  If so gold is toast.  But that is why my stuff said bail friday which I did. 

 

But I love hearing your thoughts, Even if...  Especially IF I am wrong. 

 

Thanks

 

Keith