Jump to content



Photo

2010


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 26 January 2018 - 10:54 PM

http://www.siliconin...f the epicenter



#2 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 02:17 PM

It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of

the primary wave 3.



#3 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 02:43 PM

It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of

the primary wave 3.

guess again     where do you think primary 2 ended



#4 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:09 PM

 

It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of

the primary wave 3.

guess again     where do you think primary 2 ended

 

 

 

1932 ?



#5 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:37 PM

Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.

 

 

http://elliottwavepr...rly-6-19-15.png



#6 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:55 PM

I guess this is still 1 of 3 of 3 with wave 2 maybe starting up around INDU 100k.



#7 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:58 PM

I guess this is still 1 of 3 of 3 with wave 2 maybe starting up around INDU 100k.

now ur getting close....good wirk



#8 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:00 PM

Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.

 

 

http://elliottwavepr...rly-6-19-15.png

 

Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.

 

 

http://elliottwavepr...rly-6-19-15.png

there is only 1 correct count......and that aint it.....watch the sky



#9 da_cheif

da_cheif

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,960 posts

Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:02 PM

 

 

It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of

the primary wave 3.

guess again     where do you think primary 2 ended

 

 

 

1932 ?

 

2009