Jump to content



Photo

93 TD = 94 TD, 167 TD = 168 TD & 273 CD cycles suggests a 9/21 major swing High


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Rocketman

Rocketman

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 807 posts

Posted 25 September 2018 - 02:09 PM

Thanks to Bruce L. for alerting me that the 93 TD cycle is actually a 94 TD cycle. In the same way, the 167 TD is a 168 TD cycle that along with the 273 CD cycle suggests a 9/21 major swing High.

 

94%2BTD%2BCycle.gif

94 TD cycle due 9/24H+/-

 

168%2BTD.gif

168 TD cycle due 9/21H+/-

 

273.gif

273 CD /9 Month cycle due 9/24H+/-

 

If 9/21/18 High gets confirmed, we should be ready for a sharp decline into October and possibly Novemer major Lows.

 

 

Join our free forecasts and Updates at: 

http://timeandcycles.blogspot.com/

https://twitter.com/TimeandCycles 

Email: timeandcycles@gmail.com

 

 

 


Edited by Rocketman, 25 September 2018 - 02:10 PM.


#2 Iblayz

Iblayz

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 1,033 posts

Posted 25 September 2018 - 09:48 PM

167 TD  Cycle (Pink lines on chart): 9/19/14H -167-5/20/15H -167+1-1/20/16L-167-1-9/14/16L-167+2-5/18/17L-167- 1/16/18 - 167- 9/13/18H+/-2
 
The regular 93-94 TD Cycle was also a regular cycle mentioned in the past on this blog here andhere and is next due 9/13/18+/-.
 
93 TD Cycle (red lines on chart): 9/29/15L -93- 2/11/16L -94- 6/27/16L -92- 11/4/16L -95- 8/8/17H -91- 12/14/17L -95- 5/3/18L -94- 9/13/18H+/-2
 
As fixed cycles can expand and contract it has a +/-2 TD leaway and has been pretty consistent and suggests a 9/13/18 swing High.

 

 

Not trying to pick a fight because, as I have said many times, I respect those who stick their necks out with calls on the market. Supposedly, that is what this thread on the site is about. But, the above is what you said in your last post. Just asking....what changed? Did you change something to make it fit what just happened? Did you change a date that you were counting from? Just curious as to how the same cycles can point to two different dates that are six (or seven) trading days apart. After all, do not remember seeing +/- 6 in any of your posts. Your chart above shows the 94 pointing to 9/24. That's seven trading days or still six if you change the first one from 93 to 94.

 

In your last post (on 9/13) the 93 and the 167 were clearly marked at 9/13 on the charts posted. Now the 94 is clearly marked at 9/24 and the 168 is clearly marked at 9/21.

 

In edit, I almost took the post down because I don't like to be seen as denigrating someone who sticks his/her neck out. But, I think that the above questions have merit because you clearly changed your dates. And yes, I know that you say that cycles can expand and contract, but it would be my guess that you can only see and understand that retroactively.


Edited by Iblayz, 25 September 2018 - 09:55 PM.


#3 alexnewbee

alexnewbee

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,459 posts

Posted 26 September 2018 - 04:28 AM

:)


"we do G.d's work" Lloyd Blankfein

#4 Rocketman

Rocketman

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 807 posts

Posted 26 September 2018 - 05:14 AM

Iblayz, 

 

Yes, the problem with fixed cycles is that they are not perfect cycles and they can and do expand and contract all the time, for that reason you have at times to "curve fit" it as time goes along.

 

Adding +1 TD does make a difference of + 6 or +7 TD as time progresses as can be seen in the chart.

 

The 94 TD Cycle works as well  and can not be ignored as it was the dominant 47/94 TD cycle in the markets in the past here andhere 

 

9/29/15L (+1)

2/11/16L (+0)

6/27/16L (+0)

11/4/16L (-2)

3/27/17L (+0)

8/8/17H (-2)

12/29/17L (+4)

5/3/18L (+4)

9/24/18H+/-

 

The 168 TD cycle is a more balanced fit than the 167 TD Cycle too:

 

9/19/14H (+0)

5/20/15H (-1)

1/20/16L (-1)

9/22/16H (+2)

5/18/17L (-2)

1/26/18H (+3)

9/21/18H +/-

 

94%2BTD%2BCycle.gif

94 TD cycle due 9/24H+/-

 

168%2BTD.gif

168 TD cycle due 9/21H+/-

 

273.gif

 

273 CD /9 Month cycle due 9/24H+/-