Jump to content



Photo

Science versus Testimonials


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 maineman

maineman

    maineman

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,987 posts

Posted 04 January 2007 - 11:56 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2.../04/diet.drugs/

FTC settles with companies over unproved weight-loss claims

January 4, 2007
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The marketers of four weight-control pills have agreed to pay a total of at least $25 million to settle allegations of deceptive advertising, the Federal Trade Commission announced Thursday

The four are Xenadrine EFX, CortiSlim, TrimSpa and One-A-Day WeightSmart.

The FTC alleged that the companies' weight-loss and weight-control claims were not supported by evidence.

The companies also agreed to limit their advertising claims.

"You won't find weight loss in a bottle of pills that claims it has the latest scientific breakthrough or miracle ingredient," said FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras in a written statement. "Paying for fad science is a good way to lose cash, not pounds."

The money will be used for refunds, said FTC spokeswoman Jacqueline Dizdul. "They give back their ill-gotten gains," she said.

She said it was not surprising that many people were seduced into buying the products. Professionally produced advertisements ran in major magazines. In addition, "I think everyone holds out hope that there is a quick and easy way of doing things," she said.




The FTC! Who woulda thought? Whoever can go after these liars, more power to them. The FDA late last year also announced that they were going to review a whole slew of BS over the counter products that don't do anything, too, (like "cold" remedies, cough syrup, etc. etc).



Scientific research, while not 100% flawless, at least tries hard to be honest. ALWAYS avoid products based on "testimonials"



mm
He who laughs laughs laughs laughs.

My Blog -Maineman Market Advice

#2 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 4,550 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 12:07 PM

Celebrities told to embrace the facts, not bad science

Derren Brown, the TV illusionist, said: “We’re more than aware that the media prefer a shocking story over delicate fact. In areas like food, environment and medicine, this can have serious results: such as a now dangerously low level of British kids inoculated against MMR following an unfounded media scare.

“Scientists, traditionally a quiet bunch, are now trying to redress the balance and find ways of promoting fact over misinformation.”

Simon Singh, the science writer and former presenter of Tomorrow’s World who is a trustee of Sense About Science, said: “There are numerous examples of actors or musicians scaremongering over vaccines or pesticides when they have little or no knowledge of the subject.

“Celebrities can have a huge influence on the public, but they need to make sure they are doing more good than harm by checking their facts before making any proclamations.”

Professor John Toy, of Cancer Research UK, said: “Celebrities often have a real effect on how members of the public view particular issues, especially health and lifestyle. They have a major responsibility, therefore, to be well-informed before they make statements endorsing particular treatments or products.”


http://www.timesonli...2528494,00.html

http://www.senseabou...rg.uk/index.php
-- -
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change, 
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.