Jump to content



Photo

$SOX fractal


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 spielchekr

spielchekr

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,104 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:29 PM

Not a stringent enough comparison for DNA matching, but several similar characteristics. FWIW.

Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?

Posted Image

#2 Frac_Man

Frac_Man

    Hank Wernicki M.A.

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,458 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:36 AM

I only see One fractal here .......................

But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......


Hank


hope this helps you









Not a stringent enough comparison for DNA matching, but several similar characteristics. FWIW.

Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?

Posted Image



#3 Frac_Man

Frac_Man

    Hank Wernicki M.A.

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,458 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:58 AM

On btw, the SOX did make a bottom on Friday near 453 and seems most of the selling is done.

The SOX should rally to at least 474 again this week and next week

Hank







Not a stringent enough comparison for DNA matching, but several similar characteristics. FWIW.

Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?

Posted Image



#4 spielchekr

spielchekr

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,104 posts

Posted 21 January 2007 - 04:33 PM

I only see One fractal here .......................
But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......

Hank

hope this helps you





If you answered my question, I'm not sharp enough to get it. Since the copy (small) fractal is on a much shorter time frame, it is inevitable that the x-axis of both will finally reach a date where they are proportionally equivalent in length, possibly without deviation of the copy (small) fractal from the large one. Do you have any wisdoms to share about if/when they reach that point? For example, will a new small fractal turn around and lead a larger fractal more frequently than visa versa? In fact, which is more common and/or predictable... large (fractal) leading small, or small leading large?

#5 Frac_Man

Frac_Man

    Hank Wernicki M.A.

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,458 posts

Posted 22 January 2007 - 09:15 AM

Actually Both ............... smal to large Or large to small ..............

On your chart again I only see one fractal ....................

Hank


Many times they are in proportion to one another i.e., base to copy in scale

Well back to trading today !












I only see One fractal here .......................
But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......

Hank

hope this helps you





If you answered my question, I'm not sharp enough to get it. Since the copy (small) fractal is on a much shorter time frame, it is inevitable that the x-axis of both will finally reach a date where they are proportionally equivalent in length, possibly without deviation of the copy (small) fractal from the large one. Do you have any wisdoms to share about if/when they reach that point? For example, will a new small fractal turn around and lead a larger fractal more frequently than visa versa? In fact, which is more common and/or predictable... large (fractal) leading small, or small leading large?