$SOX fractal
#1
Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:29 PM
Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?
#2
Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:36 AM
But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......
Hank
hope this helps you
Not a stringent enough comparison for DNA matching, but several similar characteristics. FWIW.
Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?
#3
Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:58 AM
The SOX should rally to at least 474 again this week and next week
Hank
Not a stringent enough comparison for DNA matching, but several similar characteristics. FWIW.
Frac Man: what do you look for when fractals end concurrently, like this may do about 5 or 6 months from now?
#4
Posted 21 January 2007 - 04:33 PM
I only see One fractal here .......................
But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......
Hank
hope this helps you
If you answered my question, I'm not sharp enough to get it. Since the copy (small) fractal is on a much shorter time frame, it is inevitable that the x-axis of both will finally reach a date where they are proportionally equivalent in length, possibly without deviation of the copy (small) fractal from the large one. Do you have any wisdoms to share about if/when they reach that point? For example, will a new small fractal turn around and lead a larger fractal more frequently than visa versa? In fact, which is more common and/or predictable... large (fractal) leading small, or small leading large?
#5
Posted 22 January 2007 - 09:15 AM
On your chart again I only see one fractal ....................
Hank
Many times they are in proportion to one another i.e., base to copy in scale
Well back to trading today !
I only see One fractal here .......................
But in answer to your question: one follows the base fractal point set for direction ....... for the
copy fractal ......
Hank
hope this helps you
If you answered my question, I'm not sharp enough to get it. Since the copy (small) fractal is on a much shorter time frame, it is inevitable that the x-axis of both will finally reach a date where they are proportionally equivalent in length, possibly without deviation of the copy (small) fractal from the large one. Do you have any wisdoms to share about if/when they reach that point? For example, will a new small fractal turn around and lead a larger fractal more frequently than visa versa? In fact, which is more common and/or predictable... large (fractal) leading small, or small leading large?