Thank you. I am aware of r-project, I am not using it though. I developed my own non-linear transform --that might exist already out there under some obscure name-- and I am probably going to publish it eventually, it is an iterative method that penalizes and rebalances for the optimal decomposition, it would be too difficult to efficiently program with the existing packages. I am trying to use the higher order transient signals for the detection of the frequency and/or phase changes...
DOW 86yr & SPX 45yr VLT TL resistances
Started by
Trend-Signals
, Jan 28 2007 02:20 PM
17 replies to this topic
#11
arbman
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 19,504 posts
Quant
#12
jjc
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 2,886 posts
Member
Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:32 AM
Thank you. I am aware of r-project, I am not using it though. I developed my own non-linear transform --that might exist already out there under some obscure name-- and I am probably going to publish it eventually, it is an iterative method that penalizes and rebalances for the optimal decomposition, it would be too difficult to efficiently program with the existing packages. I am trying to use the higher order transient signals for the detection of the frequency and/or phase changes...
R is not very good with large data sets; however it has pretty good graphical interface and it is easy to
interface to in a programming sense. I'm not a big fan of R programming, the advantage is the source is available to hack into, if your looking for something other than excel to do your plotting/graphics (think linux vs MS excel, if your already cluster based)....
#13
arbman
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 19,504 posts
Quant
Posted 29 January 2007 - 11:41 AM
Agree some of the features in the r-project are useful, btw I usually use unix (linux) based too, Excel is just for convenience though and I can run almost everything I want using the Xwin (cygwin) interface in WinXP... 
#14
Trend-Signals
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,136 posts
Member
Posted 29 January 2007 - 04:24 PM
Well, as far as I am concerned, it is DEFINITELY AND POSITIVELY PARABOLIC.
Obviously you are looking at the tip of the chart while I am talking about longer term as I consider the entire pattern of the chart. Not interested in focusing on the very recent timeframe as you are focusing on at this time.
That's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
I would like you to do the same since I see your point and will not try to further waste my time on the issue which is obviously we are in the different timeframe.
Furthermore, not interested in debating whether the parabolic trend is changed since I do NOT think that the trend is NOT changed.
Again, I repeat, that's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
Obviously you are looking at the tip of the chart while I am talking about longer term as I consider the entire pattern of the chart. Not interested in focusing on the very recent timeframe as you are focusing on at this time.
That's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
I would like you to do the same since I see your point and will not try to further waste my time on the issue which is obviously we are in the different timeframe.
Furthermore, not interested in debating whether the parabolic trend is changed since I do NOT think that the trend is NOT changed.
Again, I repeat, that's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
We are definitely not seeing the same way, here's the way I see it...
Do you agree with me now?
- kisa
Edited by Trend-Signals, 29 January 2007 - 04:34 PM.
#15
Trend-Signals
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,136 posts
Member
Posted 29 January 2007 - 04:38 PM
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$UST3M:$UST10Y&p=W&st=1990-01-01&i=p20063468746&a=78245657&r=765.png
U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 29 Jan 2007 at 05:46:59 PM GMT is:
$8,689,191,712,991.37
The estimated population of the United States is 300,831,561
so each citizen's share of this debt is $28,883.91.
U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 29 Jan 2007 at 05:46:59 PM GMT is:
$8,689,191,712,991.37
The estimated population of the United States is 300,831,561
so each citizen's share of this debt is $28,883.91.
Edited by Trend-Signals, 29 January 2007 - 04:42 PM.
#16
Trend-Signals
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,136 posts
Member
Posted 29 January 2007 - 04:54 PM
Well, as far as I am concerned, it is DEFINITELY AND POSITIVELY PARABOLIC.
Obviously you are looking at the tip of the chart while I am talking about longer term as I consider the entire pattern of the chart. Not interested in focusing on the very recent timeframe as you are focusing on at this time.
That's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
I would like you to do the same since I see your point and will not try to further waste my time on the issue which is obviously we are in the different timeframe.
Furthermore, not interested in debating whether the parabolic trend is changed since I do NOT think that the trend is NOT changed.
Again, I repeat, that's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
We are definitely not seeing the same way, here's the way I see it...
Do you agree with me now?
- kisa
#17
Trend-Signals
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,136 posts
Member
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:14 PM
This is a clean chart to present my point of view.
[quote name='Trend-Signals' date='Jan 29 2007, 04:54 PM' post='268718']
Well, as far as I am concerned, it is DEFINITELY AND POSITIVELY PARABOLIC.
Obviously you are looking at the tip of the chart while I am talking about longer term as I consider the entire pattern of the chart. Not interested in focusing on the very recent timeframe as you are focusing on at this time.
That's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
I would like you to do the same since I see your point and will not try to further waste my time on the issue which is obviously we are in the different timeframe.
Furthermore, not interested in debating whether the parabolic trend is changed since I do NOT think that the trend is NOT changed.
Again, I repeat, that's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
[quote name='kisacik' post='268586' date='Jan 29 2007, 12:40 AM']
We are definitely not seeing the same way, here's the way I see it...
- kisa
[/quote]
[quote name='Trend-Signals' date='Jan 29 2007, 04:54 PM' post='268718']
Well, as far as I am concerned, it is DEFINITELY AND POSITIVELY PARABOLIC.
Obviously you are looking at the tip of the chart while I am talking about longer term as I consider the entire pattern of the chart. Not interested in focusing on the very recent timeframe as you are focusing on at this time.
That's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
I would like you to do the same since I see your point and will not try to further waste my time on the issue which is obviously we are in the different timeframe.
Furthermore, not interested in debating whether the parabolic trend is changed since I do NOT think that the trend is NOT changed.
Again, I repeat, that's it for me as far as this topic is concerned with you and I accept the differences of our opinion.
[quote name='kisacik' post='268586' date='Jan 29 2007, 12:40 AM']
We are definitely not seeing the same way, here's the way I see it...
- kisa
[/quote]
#18
arbman
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 19,504 posts
Quant
Posted 29 January 2007 - 06:05 PM
Your observations about the broad picture are accurate and I agree and thank you for explaining and sharing your work, we were talking about the different time frames although it appears the conclusions are similar...
Edited by kisacik, 29 January 2007 - 06:05 PM.
