Want ads unanswered
#21
Posted 27 August 2007 - 10:54 AM
#22
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:00 AM
#23
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:12 AM
#24
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:21 AM
LOL@theTT staff !
i am one of those people who has to work hard not to gain weight. my current BMI is right at the top of the non-fat range, ~25 for a man, 6'1''. to stay there i usually do not eat ANY dinner. when i do, i gain nearly a pound a day when wine is included. this figures exactly in with the calories, when completely counted.
You can gain nearly a pound a day when you eat dinner? Now THAT'S what I call EATING! LOL I'm not sure how long my dinner would last if I was 'forced' to eat the 'extra' 3500 calories necessary to pack on an extra pound/day!
Until I reached 50 I was one of those people who could eat anything without gaining weight. Of course everybody hated me! Then the Medical Profession caught me ...... and told me my thyroid was very overactive and needed 'to go'. To my chagrin I then proceeded to pack on close to 90 extra pounds. At least everybody didn't hate me anymore .... but they DID point at me and make noises about how that fat man should be ashamed of himself! But the Medical Profession once again came to my rescue and convinced me THAT was not a good thing to do. So over the last year I lost 80 pounds through the simple expedience of counting calories and restricting my caloric intake ..... which I currently have 'set' at 2000-2100 calories/day. That keeps me on the downward slope at the slow rate of about 1 pound/month ... but also lets me 'cheat' with an occasional trip to the ice cream store. I DO miss hot dogs though .... not so much the hamburgers you love. But I find that when I now reach for a pack of Ball Park dogs at the store my eyes quickly scan to the 'calories from fat' listing .... after which I release my hold on the hot dogs like they're red hot!
Lee S.
#25
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:30 AM
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#26
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:44 AM
Does beer?
Only when it is preceded by peanuts and pretzels before the 14" pizza with all 12 toppings and a mixed green salad with real blue cheese and croutons on top arrives.
[attachment=5910:attachment]
Edited by mss, 27 August 2007 - 11:51 AM.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#27
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:47 AM
WHAT! You mean that hot dogs have fat in them? I'm ruined.
Does beer?
You're lucky. No fat in beer. It has some carbs though which, as I understand it, can also add fat to your personal collection. But there IS some good news. Beer is low in Na. And if you are in need of some extra potassium, 4 cans of beer will provide you with about the same potassium as a medium banana. The 4 cans will add more carbs than the banana .... but not so much as you'd notice. Of REAL note for you, though, is that it would take 22 cans of beer to get you enough calories to gain the pound that Humble claims he can gain from eating dinner. Not a bad trade off I'd say!
Lee S.
#28
Posted 27 August 2007 - 11:52 AM
Only when it is preceded by peanuts and pretzels before the 14" pizza with all 12 toppings and a mixed green salad with real blue cheese and croutons on top arrives.
Life sucks!
No wonder Owen Wilson slashed his wrists this weekend.
What do you mean I can't have Pizza?
How about Vodka?
Edited by Rogerdodger, 27 August 2007 - 11:58 AM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#29
Posted 27 August 2007 - 12:10 PM
#30
Posted 27 August 2007 - 12:15 PM
Mental illness is a bigger problem than obesity or homicide.
Start a thread on mental illness and see how many replies you get.
What? Are you crazy?!?!?
Seriously, a little "there but for the..." could go a long way.
People are getting heavier for two reasons. One is "we've" defined obesity as "an epidemic" and lowered the bar on the definition of obesity, too. The other reason is, folks really are carrying more weight than they used to because (IMO) they are doing less physical stuff than they used to. There is so much cheap, diverse entertainment at hand for anyone who wants it. There's a huge reward for sitting right there on the sofa and watching, watching, watching. If that precludes just a sunday walk, well, that adds up to pounds over time.
Then there's this darned computer. It is SO easy to spend ungodly amounts of time here, working (or putting off work, or pretending to work, or gathering steam to work, or feeling guilty because you "should be working" so don't go for a long walk or hit the gym, or whatever) and playing that I know we're all doing less physically than we might have 20 years ago.
I'm hopeful we'll be able to change this lifestyle issue.
But it's weird. We may be getting heavier as a nation, but those who AREN'T heavy seem to be in better shape on average than folks were 20 years ago. Back then I was mighty buff, and frankly much fitter than most folks that I knew in the same age bracket. Now, an awful lot of those folks in the same age bracket currently, young women and men, are very muscled and fit. As fit as I was or fitter. It's fascinating, really.
I might add, as well, that people who are heavy don't need to be beaten up. They pay more for insurance to cover the added costs of health care and earlier death. They either want to and are able to change things or not. But I'd be mighty careful judging them too harshly with too broad a brush.
Mark
Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
http://wallstreetsen...t.com/trial.htm
You can now follow me on twitter