SPX - update
Started by
mss
, Nov 29 2007 09:12 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 November 2007 - 09:12 AM
I wont bore you with a chart of the SPX at this point, there is a daily and weekly posted at the top of this board. The 8ema is still below the 34ema, but not by much, -0.360 we should know by the weekend where we are.
Below are three interesting charts, they are self explanatory. I may be very wrong here but am not yet sure the bottom is complete. Close, yes, finished, TWT. Comments and counter points wonted.
This last one is most interesting to me. Spikes are not all that common but you would think that with all the volatility we would have one. That may also be why I am still very cautious.
(john & mark jump in and say something )
mss
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#2
Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:08 AM
hi Scott,
Thanks for posting an update. I was curious as to where your charts had gotten to after November's brilliant performance.
The big question is whether this summer's low was the larger 4.5 year low. Hurst evidence is inconclusive so we have the potential for a lower low into a larger cycle bottom. On the other hand, this week's low technically looks like it could hold for a few days and that would improve the charts considerably.
What can you tell me about that squiggly yellow line? My take is that the summer of 2006 was an 18 month low and measures up with the low made by your indicator. We are now trying to dtermine the arrival of the next 18 month low and the larger 4.5 year low. Does this indicator suggest such an important bottom is in or can it go lower as the SPX finds a bottom?
Thanks for posting those great charts.
cheers,
john
Thanks for posting an update. I was curious as to where your charts had gotten to after November's brilliant performance.
The big question is whether this summer's low was the larger 4.5 year low. Hurst evidence is inconclusive so we have the potential for a lower low into a larger cycle bottom. On the other hand, this week's low technically looks like it could hold for a few days and that would improve the charts considerably.
What can you tell me about that squiggly yellow line? My take is that the summer of 2006 was an 18 month low and measures up with the low made by your indicator. We are now trying to dtermine the arrival of the next 18 month low and the larger 4.5 year low. Does this indicator suggest such an important bottom is in or can it go lower as the SPX finds a bottom?
Thanks for posting those great charts.
cheers,
john
"By the Law of Periodical Repetition, everything which has happened once must happen again and again and again-and not capriciously, but at regular periods, and each thing in its own period, not another's, and each obeying its own law ..." - Mark Twain
#3
Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:48 AM
Hi john,
The first chart has developed a problem of some sort, below is its replacement.
The cycles you refer to is by chance and not design. That chart is based on volumn and price change only over some period of time. The chart that TTHQ will correct, and in this post is the difference of two moving averages. I'll PM you the calculations later.
Both have a good record, but as always than can change. Other charts I have suggest that we have a "bottom fishing" starting, the question is where and when will we get confermation.
More later, best to you,
mss
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#4
Posted 01 December 2007 - 02:44 PM
Which indicator does the 13eSCh reflect?
Thanks mss ;-)
#5
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:24 PM
Which indicator does the 13eSCh reflect?
Thanks mss ;-)
Sorry to be so long in responding was away. This one, as noted onchart, is of the SPX.
Here is the calculation:
The calculation for "SCH" is as follows:
SCH = 25 day ROC (rate of change) of SPX (or any index) smoothed by 8ema or 13ema.
There are many ways to use it, 8 & 13 crossover, crossover of 50dy ma & or 200dy ma, etc.
25ROC is half of the 50dy & 1/4 of the 200dy
mss
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#6
Posted 07 December 2007 - 09:49 AM
This last one is most interesting to me. Spikes are not all that common but you would think that with all the volatility we would have one. That may also be why I am still very cautious.
'Spiked' yet?
Thanks.
PRICE IS KING; LINE RULES! - Laws Of Line (LOL) Trading Systems
Swing Those Lines: I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people! -- Issac Newton
Swing Those Lines: I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people! -- Issac Newton
#7
Posted 08 December 2007 - 11:58 AM
Mss, could you post an update on the 13eSCh
thanks!