35 replies to this topic

[SemiBizz]

DJIA is approaching slip zone area again... 1125X print will take it to 11203...

[mogreen]

yep: i saw/heard that.

now bob pisonu is blaming the troubles on the stock analysts, lol. he is jealous of the idiot cramer and his rants and needed one of his own. he just figured out that analysts are paid by investment banks and/or other invested interests and might not want to tell all the bad news !


WOW ! pisonu has gotten holt to some of them smart pills.

It should be evident to you that a highly paid analyst and Harvard grad is a SALESPERSON, just like the guy who sold you that new car.

[humble1]

yes, mogreen, i get that; i was talking about bob pisonu.

p.s. btw, did you see my links on the arch crawford thread which showed the WSJ article on 8/10/87 wherein they discussed his prediction for a top and crash, which happened just as he said ?

http://www.traders-t...?...=91551&st=0


anyway, there it is. you might want to review the record.

comment ?

Edited by humble1, 01 August 2008 - 12:30 PM.

[mogreen]

yes, mogreen, i get that; i was talking about bob pisonu.

p.s. btw, did you see my links on the arch crawford thread which showed the WSJ article on 8/10/87 wherein they discussed his prediction for a top and crash, which happened just as he said ?

Humble1...I was there and i remember who did and didn't. ARCH DIDN'T. Elaine Garzarelli was the only one who got credit. And she failed after that call!! Its possible that he called a crash every day for 3 years...but i know and remember it clearly. So i'd question the validity of that article. Again I WAS THERE. best trading to you.

[humble1]

mogreen: i was there, too. and the Wall Street Journal was there among others ! it is IN PRINT, as shown. it was so well known that it was discussed in the wall street journal !!!! forget it; this is dumb; it's not worth it.

Edited by humble1, 01 August 2008 - 12:36 PM.

[mogreen]

mogreen:

i was there, too. and the Wall Street Journal was there among others ! it is IN PRINT, as shown. it was so well known that it was discussed in the wall street journal !!!!

forget it; this is dumb; it's not worth it.

Humble...its not personal...I haven't read the article yet. BUT i do remember. I'm just saying that it might have been a forgery. They're are oodles of people who make this claim. AND they are liars.

Plus ARCH has been terrible over the years..sorry but it's fact and the truth.

Edited by mogreen, 01 August 2008 - 12:42 PM.

[humble1]

yep: he HAS had his ups and downs, that is for sure ! anyway, whatever ... good trading to you ... all is good.

[mogreen]

yep: he HAS had his ups and downs, that is for sure !

anyway, whatever ... good trading to you ... all is good.

ten four good buddy

[Kimston]

Arch Crawford has had his share of calls that didnt' work out, but he called the 87 top and crash better than anyone on the planet and better than any prognostication I've seen anywhere at any time. I have a copy of his newsletter dated 6 weeks before the top. In that letter he called for an 8/25/87 top to the day (based on the 5-planet Harmonic Convergence that occured on that day) to be followed by a severe crash. Kimston

[humble1]

kimston: save that one; it is market history !