I have learned from the school of hard knocks that to make a major prediction of that nature, it is better to wait for some hard evidence before pronouncing. It's fine to "hold an opinion or a view" but to state it with such conviction and maintain credibility, one should simply have more evidence on one's side.
Oh, I have a strong case. I've been outlining it.
But here's the thing: I've got a 100% accuracy rate on my "grand predictions" and 26 years worth of background. I've got my battle scars on top of battle scars.
Sure, use good trading discipline. Don't throw caution to the wind. Defer to technicals. What do THEY say?
But if you're waiting for "hard evidence", well, the market will be 50% before you get your hard evidence.
I'm saying that the primary gloom and doom scenario is so wrong as to be laughable. Things may get really complex soon, but deflationary depression is no longer a remote concern.
Mark
Mark,
Are you disagreeing with Carl here, or do place your "most dramatic reversal in economic fortunes of our lifetimes" within his fifth secular trend?
http://www.decisionp.../081031_lt.html
Carl makes some very good points, but I can tell you that it's tough finding any sort of historical analog here. I don't deny the possibility of a long consolidation phase, either. There's lots of room for that.
I'm thinking that the cap on the massive rally might come from over-stimulation driven inflation, OR, a huge increase in taxation and regulation which will constrain the stock market out in a few years.
We'll just have to see. Near term, however, there's money coming to consumers and the market and it's going to have to find a home.
Mark