Thank you Salsa, I do this for a living and I take the criticism very seriously as long as they are not insults. I do and I will make mistakes, but after all we are all following a timing criteria. Mine is based on the cycles of breadth and the cross correlations in between the cycles to estimate the intensity. I have a momentum model actually, rather than statistical model. There are secondary derivatives that go into my analysis, but this is not to place to dive into every detail anyway...
For this leg, I expected a 50 points sell off from 1070 and it fell short of my estimates, perhaps we will see it next and the cycle target will be satisfied anyway, but I am willing to take a bit risk if 1065 gap is tested as I think it should provide a bounce at least. OTOH, the gap should be tested at a minimum over the next week, perhaps sooner with the jobs report. I will sell at these nose bleeding levels for now
Here's my comment from my blog:
Aug 20, 2010: The trend still appears down despite the late recovery effort on Friday's close. We may actually see the most intense sell off next week as SPX may have already lost the 1070 support. The rally from the 1070 support hit the stiff resistance once again at 1100 and got rejected. We should see a low next week for a bounce into early September, however there is very little support in between the 1070 and the new lows. The market may loose this 50 points zone as fast as it recovered above it in early July. There seems to be still multiple cycles pushing the index down at the moment (short and intermediate term) and there is tremendous resonance in this move. A reversal or a bounce from the lower levels will also show the same characteristics and it should be a sharp one.
Apparently that level was 1040, instead of high 1120s or low 1030s as I was expecting, futures dipped below 1040 though and cash will eventually go there too, just like we visited the futures highs from last Sunday. So we got the sharp rebound into early September. In fact, I also noted that we should see the largest intervention today right after the close yesterday.
Now we should see a consolidation and most likely it will happen at lower prices. It is an intervention because the leadership in growth is not there. Perhaps as the money diffuses, the leadership may get fixed a bit better
at lower prices though OR we will continue with this mediocre leadership higher to literally fall apart by the time the final high is reached. Such a top cannot be too far though, I am looking into more consolidation and a bit more sustainable rally...
Best...