The Glaring Disparity Beween NAS and SPX Volume
#1
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:07 PM
Charts posted on General Discussion Thread at
www.*.com
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#2
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:25 PM
Edited by Rogerdodger, 01 February 2009 - 12:26 PM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#3
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:27 PM
I have to pay to read it?
![]()
AND I HAVE TO BE $ERIOUS?
($erious)
ARE YOU $ERIOUS?
No, it's on our general discussion thread, FREE to everyone.
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#4
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:29 PM
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#5
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:32 PM
Does Da_Cheif post there?
Nope, but I'm having Prime Rib Roast of Bull for dinner tonight...
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#6
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:38 PM
~Benjamin Franklin~
#7
Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:50 PM
Higher concentration of financials on S&P that are being sold (shorts and outright long liquidations) are the probable reason for this.
U.F.O.
That's pretty clear, but why would Nasdaq volume be so thin?
There might be something bullish there... we'll let the charts tell us.
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics
#8
Posted 01 February 2009 - 01:25 PM
We rally in December with thin volume.......That was not bullish.....Now, we decline with thin volume that is also bullish?.....Last Wednesday, market gap up and kept on going until the final hour, volume picked up on the down side....That was the ST, IT top.....We need massive volume for the down side to be bullish!Higher concentration of financials on S&P that are being sold (shorts and outright long liquidations) are the probable reason for this.
U.F.O.
That's pretty clear, but why would Nasdaq volume be so thin?![]()
There might be something bullish there... we'll let the charts tell us.
#9
Posted 01 February 2009 - 01:57 PM
The Nasdaq had it's LOWEST Volume January since .... January 2003.
January's high (1665.56) could be the "C point" of an A-B=C-D pattern.
The A point is 2473.20 (August high).
The B point is 1295.48 (November low).
That would project a "D point" at . . . 487.84
#10
Posted 01 February 2009 - 02:00 PM
Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"
Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.
http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics http://parler.com/Volumedynamics










