just a question ..............does anybody have the real intel's P/E ratio, because I see a P/E of about 50 at yahoo finance while my broker gives me a P/E of about 20 more or less. Which one of the two is wrong ?
intel's P/E
Started by
andr99
, Jan 14 2010 05:29 PM
21 replies to this topic
#1
andr99
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 8,539 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:29 PM
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard
#2
fib_1618
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 10,301 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:40 PM
Wall Street Journal has INTC P/E at 50.77.
Fib
Better to ignore me than abhor me.
“Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it” - Benjamin Franklin
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw
Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices, false claims and promises in order to gain power.
#3
q4wer
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 2,209 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:42 PM
The excitement is reset now 5:41PM price: 21.61
#4
andr99
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 8,539 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:49 PM
Wall Street Journal has INTC P/E at 50.77.
Fib
thanks fib................if that is the true value as you say and I believe it, well, even considering the fact that they have beaten the estimates, the lady is anyway a bit too fat.
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard
#5
stocktrender
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 339 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:51 PM
Pretty funny how all the headlines are that intel blows out the numbers and the stock is now down in afterhours. The valuation is absurd if you ask me. I tech company that has not grown in the last 10 years should not have a 50 PE. If you look at the revenue from like 2000 to now, its about the same, goes up 1 billion and down one billion. This thing should not be over $20, if that.
#6
zman
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,215 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:56 PM
i dont know why anyone would want to own this at such a high price, I mean literally, it makes no since to me...way too expensive and too big...
Education is the best defense against the media.
#7
atlasshrugged
-
- TT Patron+
- 4,409 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:59 PM
one could make the argument that its PEG..ratio...price earnings to growth ratio is attractive...
any time you can buy a company at a pe half its growth rate is a deal....
#8
andr99
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 8,539 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 06:02 PM
Pretty funny how all the headlines are that intel blows out the numbers and the stock is now down in afterhours. The valuation is absurd if you ask me. I tech company that has not grown in the last 10 years should not have a 50 PE. If you look at the revenue from like 2000 to now, its about the same, goes up 1 billion and down one billion. This thing should not be over $20, if that.
It's another new economy created by the one who printed oceans of dollars and gave them to the bankers. It will end like the first new economy we heard of.
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard
#9
IndexTrader
-
- TT Patron+
- 7,694 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2010 - 06:19 PM
That 50X PE is the last 12 months earnings, not counting this latest report. The question is what will the next 12 months earnings be? Here's the earnings beginning with the 4th quarter of 2008: $.04, $.11, -$.07, and this quarter just reported, $.40.
What would cross my mind is that INTC has a distinct cyclical aspect to their business. And therefore, earnings over the next 12 months should be better than over the last 12 months. So whatever the PE is, it's not 50X, if you're looking ahead, not behind. We do invest based on what we think the future will bring, don't we?
IT
#10
arbman
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 19,504 posts
Quant
Posted 14 January 2010 - 06:29 PM
one could make the argument that its PEG..ratio...price earnings to growth ratio is attractive...
any time you can buy a company at a pe half its growth rate is a deal....
It has not grown much for 10 years, what makes you think it will grow 11% for the next 5 years?
