Jump to content



Photo

Perfect !


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 NAV

NAV

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 16,087 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 04:12 PM

Gap fill and acceleration = ES 1390, as i said in my morning post. We hit ES 1393. 1390 should get tagged somtime in the overnight session. You gotta love TA.

"It's not the knowing that is difficult, but the doing"

 

https://twitter.com/Trader_NAV

 

 


#2 eminimee

eminimee

    I don't care who's fur is flying...

  • TT Member
  • 14,307 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 04:22 PM

yip..love ewave....as long as I'm right... :P My favorite number is still 640 oex fwiw

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$SPX&p=60&yr=0&mn=10&dy=3&i=p32870038364&a=124643024&r=7679.png

#3 SemiBizz

SemiBizz

    Volume Dynamics Specialist

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 23,217 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 04:34 PM

Well boyz, pray tonight for a big gap up! Maybe Ben will throw in the towel here. We're certainly, under normal circumstances due for some kind of a bounce. But, don't expect much... even if Ben caves for 1/2 point, the longside is just a trade. We are going to points south of here beginning with the retest of the August lows on the Nasdaq... 2386. I see quality of volume here and no reason to stop this bloodletting at all. I hope you can use my price targeting, it's been kickin butt for me. :lol:
Price and Volume Forensics Specialist

Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"

Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.

http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics  http://parler.com/Volumedynamics

#4 TMN

TMN

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,174 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 04:37 PM

Gap fill and acceleration = ES 1390, as i said in my morning post.

We hit ES 1393. 1390 should get tagged somtime in the overnight session. You gotta love TA.



nice one!

#5 IndexTrader

IndexTrader

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 7,694 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 05:38 PM

I thought you were calling for 1453 on a move above 1431.50. Did I miss something? IT EDIT: Nevermind, I see you made a post afterwards that said if the gap filled and then accelerated we could go to 1390.

Edited by IndexTrader, 08 January 2008 - 05:41 PM.


#6 pdx5

pdx5

    I want return OF my money more than return ON my money

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9,771 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 06:10 PM

I bet Benny is scratching his beard furiously trying to figure out what to do. On one hand, Gold & Oil are hitting new highs along with US dollar declining steadily. On the other hand markets ar down 10% and housing in funk. I bet he is flumoxed.

Edited by pdx5, 08 January 2008 - 06:12 PM.

"Money cannot consistently be made trading every day or every week during the year." ~ Jesse Livermore Trading Rule

#7 NAV

NAV

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 16,087 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 08:44 PM

I thought you were calling for 1453 on a move above 1431.50. Did I miss something?

IT

EDIT: Nevermind, I see you made a post afterwards that said if the gap filled and then accelerated we could go to 1390.


Firstly, we did not jump the creek, i.e gap-up above 1431.50 at the open.

"It's not the knowing that is difficult, but the doing"

 

https://twitter.com/Trader_NAV

 

 


#8 IndexTrader

IndexTrader

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 7,694 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 09:37 PM

I thought you were calling for 1453 on a move above 1431.50. Did I miss something?

IT

EDIT: Nevermind, I see you made a post afterwards that said if the gap filled and then accelerated we could go to 1390.


Firstly, we did not jump the creek, i.e gap-up above 1431.50 at the open.


Evidently you're telling me that when we opened at 1430 instead of 1431.50, and then rallied to 1437.50, your bullish forecast of 1453 was off????

IT

#9 NAV

NAV

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 16,087 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 09:57 PM

I thought you were calling for 1453 on a move above 1431.50. Did I miss something?

IT

EDIT: Nevermind, I see you made a post afterwards that said if the gap filled and then accelerated we could go to 1390.


Firstly, we did not jump the creek, i.e gap-up above 1431.50 at the open.


Evidently you're telling me that when we opened at 1430 instead of 1431.50, and then rallied to 1437.50, your bullish forecast of 1453 was off????

IT


IT,

That's not correct. Let me clarify. The fact that we did not open above the gap resistance means, i did not get the pattern confirmation i was looking for. But it was still a double bottom nevertheless. The market could still have rallied to 1453. The failure on 30-min momentum at 11:30 est and the subsequent gap-fill, confirmed the double top scenario projecting the ES 1390 level.

Edited by NAV, 08 January 2008 - 10:01 PM.

"It's not the knowing that is difficult, but the doing"

 

https://twitter.com/Trader_NAV