Jump to content



Photo

Whats scary is.. the lack of the C word


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 dcengr

dcengr

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,391 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 10:26 PM

I've got calls... I don't care if it crashes as the calls were paid for with house money. But I'm really wondering why there's no C word... I do not think we can crash here. Crashes occur with ever increasing downside, and we're not.. though that may come later. Sentiment doesn't really match a crash either. So the only two options left for me is moving sideways or up.
Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

#2 ed rader

ed rader

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,390 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 10:31 PM

I've got calls... I don't care if it crashes as the calls were paid for with house money.

But I'm really wondering why there's no C word... I do not think we can crash here. Crashes occur with ever increasing downside, and we're not.. though that may come later.

Sentiment doesn't really match a crash either.

So the only two options left for me is moving sideways or up.



what's scary to me is this board is starting to resemble a meeting of BPA (bottom pickers anonymous) :lol: .

ed rader

"Everybody's got plans... until they get hit."

-- Mike Tyson

http://erader.zenfolio.com/

#3 ogm

ogm

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,780 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 10:31 PM

Its called a pullback on monthly chart ;) Now if the monthly tred REVERSES after a few month of volatility.. then we're in real trouble.

#4 dcengr

dcengr

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,391 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 10:38 PM

what's scary to me is this board is starting to resemble a meeting of BPA (bottom pickers anonymous) :lol: .

ed rader


This bottom picker made 15 grand between friday and this morning, so maybe its not all that bad eh? :P
Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

#5 ogm

ogm

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 13,780 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 10:45 PM

I think timewise we are close to some kind of a bottom. But the question is what price will that bottom be ? Will the market really spike down ? But frankly unless we really go down under 1350 and preferably under 1320, I'm not expecting much price wise.

#6 denleo

denleo

    Member

  • Chartist
  • 3,097 posts

Posted 08 January 2008 - 11:52 PM

Crash? The market just did over the last 9 days. Denleo

#7 thespookyone

thespookyone

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,043 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 12:20 AM

The drift down-much more potent than a crash.

#8 KnowNuttin2

KnowNuttin2

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 276 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 06:45 AM

I've got calls... I don't care if it crashes as the calls were paid for with house money.

But I'm really wondering why there's no C word... I do not think we can crash here. Crashes occur with ever increasing downside, and we're not.. though that may come later.

Sentiment doesn't really match a crash either.

So the only two options left for me is moving sideways or up.



what's scary to me is this board is starting to resemble a meeting of BPA (bottom pickers anonymous) :lol: .

ed rader


HEAR HEAR...Agree and way too confident. " I'm playing with house money". We earn every penny in this very difficult game. Once you make the money it's YOURS...Keep it! It's all about money management.

#9 milbank

milbank

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 4,714 posts

Posted 09 January 2008 - 10:30 AM

Crash? The market just did over the last 9 days.

Denleo


That wasn't a crash. It's not even out of the channel. It hasn't even hit the August lows. October 16-19, 1987...now THAT was a crash. If you weren't there for that, you have no idea. For all the kudos to a certain poster including the one I made myself, "for the record" THAT was not a crash, at least not yet. So far, that was just another downward move of which we've now had three within the last 5 months.


what's scary to me is this board is starting to resemble a meeting of BPA (bottom pickers anonymous) :lol: .

ed rader


Agreed. A "crash" by definition, is not something you can "call." Posters predicting crashes remind me of the "dumb money" posts on yahoo. Especially when they do it with no chart to back up their "call". Of course, I have yet to see a responsible TA chart that shows a coming crash and I do not expect to ever see one.


The drift down-much more potent than a crash.


That is what I've always seen this coming bear to be. The fundamental nature of the underlying issues don't lend themselves to a "crash" but, a "death by a thousand cuts" as I've posted in the past ad nauseum. And yes, that will ultimately be more damaging than a "crash." LT. The good news ST, in my opinion is the ST trading volitility will be fantastic.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
--George Bernard Shaw


"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free."
--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe