I have to wait until late Sunday Night to see this updated.
(Cauz I'm a tightwad and want it free)
Now I see what you've been talking about.
LINK
Edited by Rogerdodger, 13 January 2008 - 11:56 PM.
Twenty Fricken Five Percent Bulls!
Started by
Rogerdodger
, Jan 13 2008 10:43 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Rogerdodger
-
- TT Member*
-
- 26,991 posts
Member
Posted 13 January 2008 - 10:43 PM
25% Bullish!
I have to wait until late Sunday Night to see this updated.
(Cauz I'm a tightwad and want it free)
Now I see what you've been talking about.
LINK
I have to wait until late Sunday Night to see this updated.
(Cauz I'm a tightwad and want it free)
Now I see what you've been talking about.
LINK
"Nature's Failure to Function in a 'Predictable Way'... 500 years ago?"
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#2
Rogerdodger
-
- TT Member*
-
- 26,991 posts
Member
Posted 13 January 2008 - 11:05 PM
PS: as of right now the graph has not been updated from last week's 32%.
I predict that the end of the world will be lower. Maybe 24 percent.
"Nature's Failure to Function in a 'Predictable Way'... 500 years ago?"
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#3
Rogerdodger
-
- TT Member*
-
- 26,991 posts
Member
Posted 13 January 2008 - 11:53 PM
We rally soon or write history books.
Take some pictures.
"Nature's Failure to Function in a 'Predictable Way'... 500 years ago?"
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#4
dcengr
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 13,391 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:00 AM
Why do you have to wait til sunday?
Its given out free every wednesday night the very first time its published... on the AAII website.
Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?
#5
ogm
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 13,780 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:00 AM
We rally soon or write history books.
Take some pictures.
Not all indicators are as bearish as AAII. But its getting there.
Edited by ogm, 14 January 2008 - 12:01 AM.
#6
Rogerdodger
-
- TT Member*
-
- 26,991 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:20 AM
Why do you have to wait til sunday?
Its given out free every wednesday night the very first time its published... on the AAII website.
Just lazy and never have signed up.
I don't think it's an urgent or very short term signal but more of a backdrop.
Sentiment sure is a lot different from the fall of 2000 when it was near 90. LINK
Edited by Rogerdodger, 14 January 2008 - 12:21 AM.
"Nature's Failure to Function in a 'Predictable Way'... 500 years ago?"
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#7
dcengr
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 13,391 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2008 - 12:35 AM
Why do you have to wait til sunday?
Its given out free every wednesday night the very first time its published... on the AAII website.
Just lazy and never have signed up.
I don't think it's an urgent or very short term signal but more of a backdrop.
Sentiment sure is a lot different from the fall of 2000 when it was near 90. LINK
You don't have to sign up.. its on their front page for the world to see.
Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?
#8
James Quillian
-
- Traders-Talk User
- 1,364 posts
Member
Posted 14 January 2008 - 03:44 AM
I wonder if the sample size has gotten smaller on the AAII data?
The Investor's Intelligence data doesn't look bearish at all.
If for example only 20 of the AAII members took the poll it could easily over represent bears.
In a case like that, the real read would be not in interested in the market or complacent.
I don't know that this is the case. Its just something to think about.
The Investor's Intelligence data doesn't look bearish at all.
If for example only 20 of the AAII members took the poll it could easily over represent bears.
In a case like that, the real read would be not in interested in the market or complacent.
I don't know that this is the case. Its just something to think about.
