above 1805 and its game on
#21
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:47 AM
#22
Posted 14 January 2013 - 11:34 AM
#23
Posted 15 January 2013 - 10:42 AM
which breaks down into the 4.3 year
the 34 month cycle (dividing by 2=17 month cycle
then there is the 11.33 month cycle low.
all of these cycles come in , in essentially the 1st quarter of 13
that said , sentiment is in the garbage can, where it has been. note the markings on the chart , w/sentiment as the bottom chart. potential h&s pattern in the gold market http://www.graceland...n15hulbert2.png bulls climb a wall of worry
i do think alfs count is essentially the right idea. it will all take shape into the 21-22 month cycle highs
no one said bulls are easy, if they were , everyone would be rich which is not the case
patience
dharma
#24
Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:30 PM
#25
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:02 PM
while back i pointed out aapl parabolic move. it has been very instructive. watching the action, is how parabolics end
tom mcclelland had done a study of aapl compared to the appl of its day rca. that was some months back
for me nothing is proven until the 1800is in the rear view mirror
dharma
your point about parabolics raises an interesting question in e-wave theory: how does e-wave analysis explain TREND INVERSION ?
it seems that the basic logic of e-wave is that, for any given equity, the primary trend directionally is always UP -- until they start to die.
when does this happen ? for example, if AAPL has seen its forever ATH, does this mean that TREND INVERSION iis now taking place, and AAPL's primary trend is down ? does this happen only after a Grand Supercycle completes ? but if so, doesnt that contradict the idea of fractals being composed of infinite regressions?
something that has always puzzled me about e-wave theory ...
Edited by beta, 15 January 2013 - 03:03 PM.
#26
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:46 PM
i dont know the answer it has always puzzled me as well . it implies the trend is always bullish, and corrections(even parabolics) are A_B_C corrections. and yet there is prechter lost in his own bearishness. fighting windmills for decades nowwhile back i pointed out aapl parabolic move. it has been very instructive. watching the action, is how parabolics end
tom mcclelland had done a study of aapl compared to the appl of its day rca. that was some months back
for me nothing is proven until the 1800is in the rear view mirror
dharma
your point about parabolics raises an interesting question in e-wave theory: how does e-wave analysis explain TREND INVERSION ?
it seems that the basic logic of e-wave is that, for any given equity, the primary trend directionally is always UP -- until they start to die.
when does this happen ? for example, if AAPL has seen its forever ATH, does this mean that TREND INVERSION iis now taking place, and AAPL's primary trend is down ? does this happen only after a Grand Supercycle completes ? but if so, doesnt that contradict the idea of fractals being composed of infinite regressions?
something that has always puzzled me about e-wave theory ...
dharma
#27
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:22 AM
#28
Posted 16 January 2013 - 11:47 AM
http://www.youtube.c...be_gdata_player
dharma
#29
Posted 16 January 2013 - 12:06 PM
this is a piece from 1965 where degaulle outlines the present situation in the usa monetary system
http://www.youtube.c...be_gdata_player
dharma
#30
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:23 AM
Edited by dharma, 17 January 2013 - 10:25 AM.