36 replies to this topic

[Rogerdodger]

Must be true. "HE" hasn't been wrong so far.  LOL!

 

Mister Big, Fauci calls senators Morons if they dare to question his highness.

The president’s chief medical advisor and his wife had $10.4 million in investments at the end of 2020, newly-released records show.

Fauci’s 2020 financial disclosure was released publicly Friday night by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who Fauci had called a “moron” after he inquired into Fauci’s financial disclosures during a Senate proceeding Tuesday.

 

Dr. Fauci received a big pay hike for his biodefense research activities. In other words, Fauci was paid to prevent future pandemics.

Dr. Anthony Fauci made $417,608 in 2019, the latest year for which federal salaries are available. That made him not only the highest paid doctor in the federal government, but made Fauci the highest paid out of all four million federal employees.

In fact, Dr. Fauci even made more than the $400,000 salary of the President of the United States.

 

Meanwhile doctors who have been more right than Fauci are losing their license!

Psych evaluation ordered for doctor accused of misinformation...

 

China Covid death toll could be 17,000% higher than admitted..

It's feared the country's true Covid fatality figure is around the 1.7million mark opposed to the 4,636 reported by Chinese authorities - despite having the world's strictest lockdown.

 

That got a lot of old Chinese folks out of the way for China's world dominance.

China is sure getting it's money's worth out of it's "investments" in our government.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 15 January 2022 - 11:04 PM.

[claire]

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

[hhh]

https://rumble.com/v...he-science.html

[brucekeller]

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

 

Well we do know that at the high levels they are apparently very worried about climate change and there is this belief that we are already past the breaking point... plus just overpopulation in general in regards to non-renewable resources before space mining is a thing... and we know most of our leaders are psychos / narcissists, so it wouldn't be much of a stretch to think a few powerful ones could be considering depopulation through multiple avenues and believe it's the noble thing to do and the only way to save the human race or something.  

 

I don't REALLY believe it, but at the same time I don't think it's an impossibility we are reaching that point of thinking for some leaders. 

[blackcloud]

The only one's that get the podium are in agreement with the govt. or sponsored by them, with the "media" plowing the way.  Any and all questions, even when they are backed by data, are instantly squashed, led

by the govt. with the "media" plowing the way.

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

[hhh]

Global warming is nonsense:

[Rich C]

 

The only one's that get the podium are in agreement with the govt. or sponsored by them, with the "media" plowing the way.  Any and all questions, even when they are backed by data, are instantly squashed, led

by the govt. with the "media" plowing the way.

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

 

Horse hockey.  Trump was president for the first year of the pandemic.  His people had the podium, Trump himself ran the podium.  Trump offered Hydroxychloroquine as a solution.  The medical community, based on the sum total of studies, rejected HCQ.  But if Trump believed in studies that attempted to show it as a therapy, all he had to do was stand up a medical researcher and present the study to the nation, go through it at the podium.  He had that right and that forum, and he never took advantage of it.  He FAILED to make the case.  Maybe he did not want to be made a fool in front of the nation for pushing a solution that was not yet adequately researched, or maybe he saw that after signs of invitro success, it did not translate to success in animals or humans.  But if the case could have been made, and Trump was the savior of the nation with a cheap pre-existing drug, Trump would have marketed himself as the "only person who could solve the problem", till the cows came home. 

 

He never pushed it.  He had the podium.  He could not make the case. 

Edited by Rich C, 16 January 2022 - 10:43 AM.

[hhh]

Trump likely is controlled opposition and had too much financial involvement with the pharmaceutical companies' exploitation of the plandemic to sell ineffective jabs for billions and billions of dollars, while simultaneously creating a world of new captured customers for further products to "treat" the side effects. It's a never ending money machine. We've only seen the beginning.

[blackcloud]

https://www.the-sun....covid-survival/

 

https://www.cnn.com/...irus/index.html

 

https://www.indiatod...1892-2021-06-07

 

https://www.bing.com...n+hcq&FORM=VDRE

 

 

https://www.bing.com...n+hcq&FORM=VDRE

 

Tons more if you want them.

 

 

The only one's that get the podium are in agreement with the govt. or sponsored by them, with the "media" plowing the way.  Any and all questions, even when they are backed by data, are instantly squashed, led

by the govt. with the "media" plowing the way.

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

 

Horse hockey.  Trump was president for the first year of the pandemic.  His people had the podium, Trump himself ran the podium.  Trump offered Hydroxychloroquine as a solution.  The medical community, based on the sum total of studies, rejected HCQ.  But if Trump believed in studies that attempted to show it as a therapy, all he had to do was stand up a medical researcher and present the study to the nation, go through it at the podium.  He had that right and that forum, and he never took advantage of it.  He FAILED to make the case.  Maybe he did not want to be made a fool in front of the nation for pushing a solution that was not yet adequately researched, or maybe he saw that after signs of invitro success, it did not translate to success in animals or humans.  But if the case could have been made, and Trump was the savior of the nation with a cheap pre-existing drug, Trump would have marketed himself as the "only person who could solve the problem", till the cows came home. 

 

He never pushed it.  He had the podium.  He could not make the case. 

 

[Rich C]

 

https://www.the-sun....covid-survival/

 

https://www.cnn.com/...irus/index.html

 

https://www.indiatod...1892-2021-06-07

 

https://www.bing.com...n+hcq&FORM=VDRE

 

 

https://www.bing.com...n+hcq&FORM=VDRE

 

Tons more if you want them.

 

 

The only one's that get the podium are in agreement with the govt. or sponsored by them, with the "media" plowing the way.  Any and all questions, even when they are backed by data, are instantly squashed, led

by the govt. with the "media" plowing the way.

To believe much of the wild speculations that are offered here by many carries the assumption that every developed nation is hell-bent on killing off their population as well as suffering major economic consequences by believing the consensus of the overwhelming majority of leading virologists, epidemiologists, infectious disease experts, and many thousands of peer-reviewed leading researchers of the world. An alternate possibility is to assume that every such nation has been tricked by legions of scientists who are conspiring to accomplish the same world-wide destruction.

 

Questions are an integral aspect of scientific study with constant reevaluation and research to examine new information and data to determine its veracity. But speculations are not accepted until rigorously examined. Progress in understanding Covid-19 has proceeded at a remarkable pace. Of course, revisions and elaborations of nuances have occurred as it does in any scientific study. There are continual reexaminations of former conclusions and changing data, but to accept any hypothesis or study without a thorough examination of the data and retesting for it's reliability and validity would not be science. It would be chaos. I fear that we're heading back to the Middle-Ages.

 

Horse hockey.  Trump was president for the first year of the pandemic.  His people had the podium, Trump himself ran the podium.  Trump offered Hydroxychloroquine as a solution.  The medical community, based on the sum total of studies, rejected HCQ.  But if Trump believed in studies that attempted to show it as a therapy, all he had to do was stand up a medical researcher and present the study to the nation, go through it at the podium.  He had that right and that forum, and he never took advantage of it.  He FAILED to make the case.  Maybe he did not want to be made a fool in front of the nation for pushing a solution that was not yet adequately researched, or maybe he saw that after signs of invitro success, it did not translate to success in animals or humans.  But if the case could have been made, and Trump was the savior of the nation with a cheap pre-existing drug, Trump would have marketed himself as the "only person who could solve the problem", till the cows came home. 

 

He never pushed it.  He had the podium.  He could not make the case. 

 

 

Trump had the podium and yet he failed to put up an expert with a creditable study to PROVE to the American people that HCQ was either a prophylactic or a cure for Covid19.  That is because no creditable scientist nor study existed, that is why Trump never went hard to present the proof and PROVE to the American people that HCQ worked.  He never even tried.

 

Trump saying he was taking HCQ means nothing, that is not a creditable statement, and Trump was the greatest liar of all the presidents.  Most people would not believe him.  Yet if HCQ had prophylactic value and Trump was taking HCQ, why did Trump get Covid?  If anything, he himself PROVED it did not work.  And when he GOT Covid 19, he did not take HCQ as a treatment, or we never would have heard the end of that story either.  Every indication from that episode is that HCQ did not work, and Trump did not trust it as a treatment.

 

HCQ was so effective in India that so many people died of Covid19 they were running out of wood to burn the bodies!

https://www.indiatod...5015-2021-04-26

 

Trump had the podium, he could have presented any proof he wanted, yet he did NOT.  Because clearly he could not find any creditable proof to present. 

Edited by Rich C, 16 January 2022 - 11:30 AM.