Jump to content



Photo

Question for Global Warming theorists...


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#31 techw

techw

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9 posts

Posted 21 September 2006 - 08:24 AM

We could be warming because we are coming out of an 'ice age', most evidence says the carbon mankind produces is a drop in a bucket. The thought of govt. controlling the weather by peoples votes every 4 years is scary. What has govt ever done right? John

#32 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 26 September 2006 - 11:12 PM

1974 TIME WARNS OF COMING ICE AGE!

"...the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.

...Telltale signs are everywhere...

...Scientists have found other indications of global cooling."




A December 29, 1974 New York Times article on global cooling reported that climatologists believed “the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure in a decade.”

The article also warned that unless government officials reacted to the coming catastrophe, “mass deaths by starvation and probably in anarchy and violence” would result.


In 1975, the New York Times reported that “A major cooling [was] widely considered to be inevitable.”


A letter sent to the Canadian Prime Minister on April 6,2006 by 60 prominent scientists who question the basis for climate alarmism, clearly explains the current state of scientific knowledge on global warming.

The 60 scientists wrote:

http://www.canada.co...be-4db87559d605

“If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.” The letter also noted:

“‘Climate change is real’ is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified. Global climate changes occur all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural ‘noise.’”

#33 mss

mss

    I'M WATCHING

  • TT Sponsor
  • 6,182 posts

Posted 28 September 2006 - 05:48 AM

:) The general public and the Spies, (U S News media), will never understand that this sort of "crap" is usually done to get-----ARE YOU READY FOR THIS------funds to do research so "they" can have an income to live on. Sort of like lawyers filling lawsuits, to have a steady income. mss
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!

#34 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:58 PM

A fellow Oklahoman is the Chairman of the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
This week he stirred up a worldwide stink when he gave his 8th "Global Warming" speech on the floor of the US Senate and focused attention on the media's coverage of climate change over the past century:

SENATOR JAMES INHOFE CHAIRMAN, SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SPEECH

His speech was then attacked on CNN "news" and he replied:

INHOFF REPLY TO CNN

Edited by Rogerdodger, 28 September 2006 - 10:05 PM.


#35 mss

mss

    I'M WATCHING

  • TT Sponsor
  • 6,182 posts

Posted 30 September 2006 - 08:39 AM

A fellow Oklahoman is the Chairman of the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
This week he stirred up a worldwide stink when he gave his 8th "Global Warming" speech on the floor of the US Senate and focused attention on the media's coverage of climate change over the past century:


SENATOR JAMES INHOFE was on FOX & FRIENDS this morning, 9/30/06 and the little _ _ _ _ did her best to po po what he was saying.
:cat:
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!

#36 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 30 September 2006 - 11:00 AM

I think it can be easily proven that the source of much hot air is Washington, DC. The other source of hot air...news media. :rolleyes:

Edited by Rogerdodger, 30 September 2006 - 11:02 AM.


#37 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 11 October 2006 - 08:16 PM

NUREMBERG-STYLE TRIALS PROPOSED FOR GLOBAL WARMING SKEPTICS
:ninja:



#38 ty250

ty250

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 206 posts

Posted 16 October 2006 - 02:23 PM

My FF, about a year after Goering's disciples pass absurd laws to curb the natural warming of the earth the same fools will have to fund more research because we will be entering a cooling phase. As rodger said ,the academics need to provide for their existence by funding studies at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. TY

#39 ty250

ty250

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 206 posts

Posted 17 October 2006 - 08:43 AM

OOPS!!! Goebbels not Goering Goebbels- minister of propaganda,misinfomation and lies to achieve political gain

#40 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 26,873 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 02:10 AM

All too often it seems mostly about PR, not real action:
Prince Charles is to fly in a jumbo jet to New York pick up an award for his work on the environment.
He reserved 62 seats for his party of 20. This means their effective 'carbon footprint' is three times what it would be if every seat was used.
The trip to New York will result in the emission of 24 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
To 'offset' this, the prince would need to pay £177.60 to plant trees.

The award will look good over his wood burning fireplace.

"Last year Charles spent £1.1 million on private planes and helicopters, including £304,000 on a private jet for his official tour of Egypt, India and Saudi Arabia."

Edited by Rogerdodger, 19 January 2007 - 02:18 AM.