Question for Global Warming theorists...
#31
Posted 21 September 2006 - 08:24 AM
#32
Posted 26 September 2006 - 11:12 PM
"...the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.
...Telltale signs are everywhere...
...Scientists have found other indications of global cooling."
A December 29, 1974 New York Times article on global cooling reported that climatologists believed “the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure in a decade.”
The article also warned that unless government officials reacted to the coming catastrophe, “mass deaths by starvation and probably in anarchy and violence” would result.
In 1975, the New York Times reported that “A major cooling [was] widely considered to be inevitable.”
A letter sent to the Canadian Prime Minister on April 6,2006 by 60 prominent scientists who question the basis for climate alarmism, clearly explains the current state of scientific knowledge on global warming.
The 60 scientists wrote:
http://www.canada.co...be-4db87559d605
“If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.” The letter also noted:
“‘Climate change is real’ is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified. Global climate changes occur all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural ‘noise.’”
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#33
Posted 28 September 2006 - 05:48 AM
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#34
Posted 28 September 2006 - 09:58 PM
This week he stirred up a worldwide stink when he gave his 8th "Global Warming" speech on the floor of the US Senate and focused attention on the media's coverage of climate change over the past century:
SENATOR JAMES INHOFE CHAIRMAN, SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SPEECH
His speech was then attacked on CNN "news" and he replied:
INHOFF REPLY TO CNN
Edited by Rogerdodger, 28 September 2006 - 10:05 PM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#35
Posted 30 September 2006 - 08:39 AM
A fellow Oklahoman is the Chairman of the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
This week he stirred up a worldwide stink when he gave his 8th "Global Warming" speech on the floor of the US Senate and focused attention on the media's coverage of climate change over the past century:
SENATOR JAMES INHOFE was on FOX & FRIENDS this morning, 9/30/06 and the little _ _ _ _ did her best to po po what he was saying.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#36
Posted 30 September 2006 - 11:00 AM
Edited by Rogerdodger, 30 September 2006 - 11:02 AM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#38
Posted 16 October 2006 - 02:23 PM
#39
Posted 17 October 2006 - 08:43 AM
#40
Posted 19 January 2007 - 02:10 AM
Prince Charles is to fly in a jumbo jet to New York pick up an award for his work on the environment.
He reserved 62 seats for his party of 20. This means their effective 'carbon footprint' is three times what it would be if every seat was used.
The trip to New York will result in the emission of 24 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
To 'offset' this, the prince would need to pay £177.60 to plant trees.
The award will look good over his wood burning fireplace.
"Last year Charles spent £1.1 million on private planes and helicopters, including £304,000 on a private jet for his official tour of Egypt, India and Saudi Arabia."
Edited by Rogerdodger, 19 January 2007 - 02:18 AM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.