a definitive explanation of satanism
Moleneaux
statist consent is thus, if you didnt fight to the death you consented to rape
Posted 23 September 2017 - 11:49 PM
a definitive explanation of satanism
Moleneaux
statist consent is thus, if you didnt fight to the death you consented to rape
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
Posted 24 September 2017 - 11:49 AM
lets review suppression of the poor.
One the top level based on the temporary contract employees that get fired weekly for no call no show, most of them
choose poverty or are induced by federali mind control.
Then what are the one in a million producers worth to sustain any lawful commerce existing within the satanist collapse genocide.
So, likely need a car if they choose to work, auto regitration work tax or threat of police violence and $250 fines against $400 weekly income.
anti competitive anti meritocracy unions forced dues or no human right to work against christian free will.
unions created original min wage laws to keep the low skilled unemployed and out of competition with skilled workers.
min wage, illegal to work low skill first jobs where they might learn something outside of communist diseducation.
SS tax
income tax
sales tax
payroll tax on employers
obamacide rent hyperinflation, quantitative easing, negative interest rates
wallstreet 401k fraud, taxed
death tax
property tax, no human property rights
force innoculations 40% autistic
floride IQ damage
1990's clinton inflation calculation falsification statute, 7% inflation labor theft per year compounding
just a few off the top
pigs to the slaughter keep coming back for more marxist communism genocide depopulation
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
Posted 05 October 2017 - 11:38 AM
College loans increase inequality - they get the gold mine, we get the shaft
The latest research adds to the growing body of evidence that higher education and student loans aren’t advancing economic mobility but are actually just an additional burden for poor families.
In 2015, students from poorer families were struggling much more to pay back their debts than their wealthier counterparts. Students from the poorest quartile of families who started school in the 2003-2004 academic year still owed 91% of the debt they borrowed 12 years after entering school on average. Students from the wealthiest families owed 59%.
In the past, rich and poor students struggled to pay back their debts at close to the same rate. Borrowers who took out federal student loans during the 1995 to 1996 academic year were paying them back at almost the same rate — regardless of their family income when they entered school, By 2007, or 12 years after they originally took out the loans, students from the richest 25% of families still owed about 72% of their debt on average, while students from the poorest families still owed about 77%.
That widening gap in outcomes between rich and poor students is “distressing,” said Ben Miller, the senior director of postsecondary education at the Center for American Progress.
http://www.marketwat...&dist=bigcharts
Posted 11 October 2017 - 07:02 PM
This obsession with Russia is a tactic used by the ruling elite, and in particular the Democratic Party, to avoid facing a very unpleasant reality: that their unpopularity is the outcome of their policies of deindustrialization and the assault against working men and women and poor people of color.
It is the result of disastrous trade agreements like NAFTA that abolished good-paying union jobs and shipped them to places like Mexico, where workers without benefits are paid $3.00 an hour.
It is the result of the transformation of the country into an oligarchy. The nativist revolt on the right, and the aborted insurgency within the Democratic Party, makes sense when you see what they have done to the country.
Politicians like the Clintons, Pelosi and Schumer are creations of Wall Street. That is why they are so virulent about pushing back against the Sanders wing of the Democratic Party. Without Wall Street money, they would not hold political power. The Democratic Party doesn’t actually function as a political party. It’s about perpetual mass mobilization and a hyperventilating public relations arm, all paid for by corporate donors. The base of the party has no real say in the leadership or the policies of the party, as Bernie Sanders and his followers found out.
Posted 26 October 2017 - 01:27 PM
They are the Ruling Class:
Wall Street and Silicon Valley
Hollywood and Mainstream Media
Establishments of both political parties
Federal bureaucracy and lobbyists
Colleges and Universities
Big Pharma and Medical-Industrial complex
CIA and Foreign policy establishment
Military contractors
Posted 13 March 2019 - 09:15 AM
Posted 04 August 2019 - 09:02 AM
Democrats Killed Their Populist Soul https://twitter.com/...295107676221440
6. America is a shattered country. And not because of Trump. It is shattered because Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan endorsed sh*tty financier over our culture, Clinton and Bush doubled down on that, and Obama made the aristocracy they created quite explicit.
7. To truly reckon with this horrific tragedy, that took a great democracy and turned it into a nation wracked with greed, suicide and despair, means personal introspection about our own place in the pecking order. Neither Dems nor Rs have shown a willingness to really do that.
8. The Wall Street Bob Rubin mafia is empowered because Dems confuse wisdom for intelligence. They think Harvard and McKinsey and Rhodes scholarships and Google sinecures represent wisdom, instead of social credentialing for smart elites who are often but not always sociopaths.
9. So does the entire leadership of the party, left, right, and center. They don't admit the Clinton and Obama agendas were a catastrophe, and they don't admit the Clinton and Obama agenda has been endorsed by the average Democratic voter.