Even More Vaccine Studies

Nothing a fifth booster can't cure. Isn't it intuitively obvious that repeatedly injecting a foreign mRNA fragment encased in nanolipid technology that causes your own DNA to produce a computer simulated toxic spike protein throughout your body with no off switch bypassing your immune system's hundreds of thousands of years of fine tuning is the path to robust health? Are you a crazy anti-vaxxer or something? 

And in other news, yet another large Ivermectin Study just released.

https://www.cureus.c...-score-matching

I have personally seen this stuff work nearly miraculously post infection...pretty safe bet most of the detractors would never go anywhere near it, and have Zero firsthand knowledge or experience.

In any event, seems to work fairly well pre-infection as well...

Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

Vanden Bossche on the complete insanity of giving children the GMO shot....

Actually surprised CensorTube has left this up....

I am one of the unlucky ones who got Tinnitus a couple of days after my second Pfizer vaccine. I went to two specialist and got a hearing test. Both specialist said they've had patients with similar side effects. I personally know three other unlucky people like me who had the same side effect. Fortunately for me I don't have problems sleeping since I workout about 6 days a week, by 8:30pm I am so tired that I fall asleep easily.

I am skipping the booster unless I am forced to get it for travel or for work.

And in other news, yet another large Ivermectin Study just released.

 

https://www.cureus.c...-score-matching

 

I have personally seen this stuff work nearly miraculously post infection...pretty safe bet most of the detractors would never go anywhere near it, and have Zero firsthand knowledge or experience.

 

In any event, seems to work fairly well pre-infection as well...

 

Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).

 

Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

FWIW…and for many, not at all surprising as this was confirmed in the spring of last year: https://tinyurl.com/2p88tafk

Wonder why the American Politburo still hasn’t mentioned this yet?

Fib

From a study in the original post (first study):

"In conclusion, we have described the clinical features of VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis in detail, allowing us to propose diagnostic criteria for this condition. We recommend that all patients presenting with cerebral venous thrombosis within 28 days of COVID-19 vaccination should be checked for anti-PF4 antibodies, whatever their platelet count, until there are sufficient data to set an upper limit on the platelet count with which VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis might occur. We have shown that VITT-associated cerebral venous thrombosis has poorer outcomes than other forms of cerebral venous thrombosis and our data suggest that non-heparin anticoagulants and immunoglobulin might improve outcomes. However, VITT appears to be a very rare side-effect of vaccination with the ChAdOx1 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) vaccine, the risk of which is likely to be greatly outweighed by the benefit of vaccination against COVID-19 for most people."

In other words, get vaccinated.

It's hard to prove the vaccines are that great a threat to humanity when the article you post says the risk of very poor outcome from Covid far outweighs the risk of the Astrazeneca vaccine.

got Tinnitus a couple of days after my second Pfizer vaccine

Nothing to see here...except that Tinnitus can be FATAL!

Suicidal Tendencies Among Tinnitus Sufferers

Specifically, 9 percent of women and 5.5 percent of men with severe tinnitus tried to commit suicide. Overall, those with even milder forms of tinnitus were also more likely to attempt to kill themselves, compared to individuals with no tinnitus-related symptoms.

 

A very close friend began having large whelps appear after her 1st shot.

After the second dose, she nearly died several times from re-occuring anaphylactic shock and had to be hospitalized to save her life.

I guess if she died from the shots or caught Covid in the hospital, she would have been counted as just another Covid death.

Another close relative's teen aged daughter has been suffering from heart issues since her jab months ago.

Child Suicides Rising During Lockdown - WebMD

Edited by Rogerdodger, 16 January 2022 - 05:36 PM.

My Grand-daughter is masked and fully vaxxed and still caught the Omicron. Why?

Her vax was for a DIFFERENT VIRUS from 2 years ago!

Amicus Brief presented to the supreme court:

“The Administration is now mandating a vaccine designed for a two-year old virus that no longer exists, when the virus that’s everywhere is dramatically less dangerous—on par with a typical respiratory virus—and the mandated vaccines are ineffective at stopping infections from sweeping the country.

Without even considering the mandate’s many constitutional and statutory defects, it should be easy for the Supreme Court to stay it just based on the evolving scientific facts.”

Annually, how many "flu" shots are ineffective, because they are not specific to the latest strain?

Edited by Rogerdodger, 16 January 2022 - 05:43 PM.

....

And in other news, yet another large Ivermectin Study just released.

 

https://www.cureus.c...-score-matching

 

I have personally seen this stuff work nearly miraculously post infection...pretty safe bet most of the detractors would never go anywhere near it, and have Zero firsthand knowledge or experience.

 

In any event, seems to work fairly well pre-infection as well...

 

Results: Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects were included in the analysis: 113,845 (71.3%) regular ivermectin users and 45,716 (23.3%) non-users. Of these, 4,311 ivermectin users were infected, among which 4,197 were from the city of Itajaí (3.7% infection rate), and 3,034 non-users (from Itajaí) were infected (6.6% infection rate), with a 44% reduction in COVID-19 infection rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53-0.58; p < 0.0001). Using PSM, two cohorts of 3,034 subjects suffering from COVID-19 infection were compared. The regular use of ivermectin led to a 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality (25 [0.8%] versus 79 [2.6%] among ivermectin non-users; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49; p < 0.0001). When adjusted for residual variables, reduction in mortality rate was 70% (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46; p < 0.0001). There was a 56% reduction in hospitalization rate (44 versus 99 hospitalizations among ivermectin users and non-users, respectively; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for residual variables, reduction in hospitalization rate was 67% (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 023-0.66; p < 0.0001).

 

Conclusion: In this large PSM study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

No amount of bogus studies are going to change the fact Ivermectin is not been proven a successful treatment method for covid.

Even the people in Brazil know it's bogus. They were given kits with ivermectin and it didn't work. Instead family members around them passed away. You'd think the country which apparently knows the solution to COVID wouldn't have the worst death rates in the world. The city Itajai had the highest fatality rates of any city in Brazil and that's where ivermectin was heavily pushed.

Edited by orange, 17 January 2022 - 08:12 AM.