Jump to content


Loss of masculine virtues

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#11 AChartist



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,851 posts

Posted 02 January 2017 - 11:36 AM

I dont like to take much from beforeitsnews but it is just independent free speech bloggers,

with good stuff too,

which is what the whole Gutenberg press was about that defeating satanism the first time.


A good report on the feminazi genocide mind control technologies. The link has some videos that dont copy here.





Rise of the War Harpies: The Women Destroying our World
Monday, January 2, 2017 6:50
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Stumbleupon Share on Reddit  LIKE
(Before It's News)


Aeneas Georg
Wed, 28 Dec 2016

The biggest problem besetting the psychopathic elite in their push for global domination is that normal human beings don’t want war. Most people, for the most part, just want to live a peaceful life with their family and friends. So how do you sell something as unpalatable as war? There are several options, which can be used alone, or in combination:


Make people feel that their peaceful lives and/or core values are under attack by some outside enemy, i.e. the other “threatening our way of life.”

Demonize the government (especially its leader) of a foreign country as being excessively cruel and barbaric, i.e. “Saddam/Gadaffi/Assad is killing his own people.”

Appeal to human values of caring for the weakest in society and highlight that these groups are being especially targeted and victimized, a doctrine termed R2P, “responsibility to protect”.

Claim that Western civilization is under threat, and that a descent into barbarism by foreign hordes is on the cards if certain countries are not invaded.

© Unknown
To enhance the promotional effect, women are often chosen to sell war, the female gender being most often associated with nurturing, caring, creativity, civil society and peace.

Without a doubt, the pathological elite use this fact to sway the general population in the direction of supporting wars of conquest. It helps that when wars are sold on the American and world public, they are presented as “humanitarian interventions” to protect women and children. Of course, this is just a BS narrative to garner popular support.

Just to be clear, this is not a witch-hunt, and a more extensive list could equally be compiled of war pimps. But I hope this list will serve to redress an inherent sexism when it comes to warfare: female psychopaths don’t get their fair share of recognition.

So here’s a list of the women eligible to be named war harpies. You’ll note that they all have one thing in common: at least one war under their belt:

Margaret Thatcher (Falkland war)
Madeleine Albright (Yugoslavia, Iraq)
Hillary Clinton (Haiti, Honduras, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen)
Condoleezza Rice (Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia)
Samantha Power (Syria, Yemen, Ukraine)
Susan Rice (DRCongo, Libya, Syria)
Michele Flournoy (Syria)
Victoria Nuland (Libya, Ukraine)
Kimberly Kagan (Afghanistan, Iraq)
One other interesting point that links all these women is that all are/were Russophobic. To ensure the Military Industrial Complex gets enough contracts, it’s important to pick a big ‘enemy’ and not just a small country to justify the huge transference of taxpayer’s money from the taxpayer to the war-makers and war-mongers.

Margaret Thatcher (1925 – 2013)

© Time Magazine
Maggie got her war apart from her war at home on common people, even though she had to go half way around the world to pick it, with Argentina.
Since Margaret Thatcher is no longer among the living, her description will be brief, not because she was any less of a war harpy, but simply because, for a lot of the younger generation, she is relatively unknown. What is interesting in light of the present climate is that even back then, hysterical accusations were made against Russia to scare people. It’s a long-standing, time-tested policy. From Wiki:

On 19 January 1976 Thatcher made a speech in Kensington Town Hall in which she made a scathing attack on the Soviet Union:

The Russians are bent on world dominance, and they are rapidly acquiring the means to become the most powerful imperial nation the world has seen. The men in the Soviet Politburo don’t have to worry about the ebb and flow of public opinion. They put guns before butter, while we put just about everything before guns.[69]

In response, the Soviet Defence Ministry newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda (Red Star) called her the “Iron Lady,” a sobriquet she gladly adopted.

Thatcher got her war: against Argentina over the Falkland Islands.

Margaret Thatcher’s criminal legacy:

“It wasn’t just foreigners that Thatcher declared war on. Armed with her snake-oil economic policies of privatisation, deregulation, unleashing finance capitalism, pump-priming the rich with tax awards subsidised by the ordinary working population, Thatcher declared war on the British people themselves. She famously proclaimed that “there was no such thing as society” and went on to oversee an explosion in the gap between rich and poor and the demolition of social conditions in Britain.”

British singer Morrissey said: ‘Thatcher was a terror without an atom of humanity’:

“Every move she made was charged by negativity; she destroyed the British manufacturing industry, she hated the miners, she hated the arts, she hated the Irish Freedom Fighters and allowed them to die, she hated the English poor and did nothing at all to help them, she hated Greenpeace and environmental protectionists, she was the only European political leader who opposed a ban on the ivory trade, she had no wit and no warmth and even her own cabinet booted her out.”

Madeleine Albright (1937-)

© Time Magazine
Ms. Albright is interesting; she served as a mentor for two other war harpies that we will get to a little later, namely Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice. Albright became the US ambassador to the UN in the first Bill Clinton administration in February 1993 and later in January 1997 became the first female Secretary of State in the US. In these capacities she did what she could to up the ante. Here is a short list of a few of her destructive achievements:

NATO’s intervention in Bosnia began in 1992. In 1993, Albright became US Ambassador to the UN, where she influenced policy regarding the Balkans.

Colin Powell, the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, recalls Albright pressuring him to send troops to Bosnia in 1992.

“What’s the point of having this superb military that you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?” she said.


Albright is credited with encouraging Bill Clinton to partake in a bit of bombing to encourage Slobodan Milošević to sign the Rambouillet peace accord.

NATO bombed Yugoslavia for 78 days following accusations that Milošević was ethnically cleansing Albanians in Kosovo.

The late Milošević was quietly and de facto cleared of all charges by the Hague Tribunal in 2016, but by the time the truth came out, Yugoslavia was long gone, broken into seven, more manageable and exploitable, countries. One of those profiteers, Albright’s financial management company, was involved in the privatization of Kosovo’s telecommunications company. From Wikipedia, one can learn that she too likely profits well from her war mongering, along with other untouchables:

Madeleine Albright is a co-investor with Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild and George Soros, in a $350 million investment vehicle called Helios Towers Africa, which intends to buy or build thousands of mobile phone towers in Africa

Ms. Albright also played a key role in the Rwandan genocide. Not only did she block UN interventions, she also denied that it was a genocide:

“The Americans, led by US Ambassador Madeleine Albright, played the key role in blocking more expeditious action by the UN… and with American UN Ambassador Madeleine Albright advocating the most token of forces and the United States adamantly refusing to accept publicly that a full-fledged, Convention-defined genocide was in fact taking place,” a post-genocide report established.

One has the feeling that Ms. Albright never could get enough blood on her hands. She was key in maintaining the sanctions on Iraq, something that resulted in the death of half a million children. Later, she would justify such brutal slaughter of innocents by saying “the price is worth it”:

In an appearance on 60 Minutes, Albright was asked if the death of so many children was worth it, “We think the price is worth it,” she responded.

A war harpy’s worst nightmare is that peace might ever break out, because not only would their profits dry up, but they would run the risk of being hauled off to a war crimes tribunal. Unsurprisingly, Albright recently implied that there was a special place in hell for American women who don’t vote for Hillary Clinton. That’s probably not an idle threat.

Hillary Clinton (1947-)

Because the threat of perjury charges is so compelling . . . . riiiight.
First lady from 1993 to 2001. U.S senator for New York from 2001 to 2009. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2012. Hillary Clinton’s chose Albright as her top informal advisor on foreign policy matters during Clinton’s stint in the State Dept. For Hillary, the only war that is not a good war, is the war where she is not involved or where her armed, trained and funded terrorists get beaten, as occurred recently in Syria. Otherwise, bombing developing countries back to the stone age is her favorite sport.

Clinton fanatically supported the war in Kosovo, voted for the war on Afghanistan, the war on Iraq and very aggressively pursued a war on Libya in tandem with National Security Council figure Samantha Power (Ambassador to the UN), Susan Rice and Spokesperson for the United States Department of State Victoria Nuland. Clinton was, it seems, very pleased with what must have been the crowning glory of her career, when Libya’s sovereign leader, Colonel Gaddafi, was publicly sodomized and murdered by her armed and trained ‘moderate’ rebels, in her honor.

She was also on the watch during the coup in Honduras (2009), the coup in Paraguay (2012), the de facto coup/takeover in Haiti (2010). Her support for the coup in Ukraine and the ongoing Saudi war on Yemen are well known. The list of Hillary Clinton’s war mongering is long and too long for this article. For more info, see:

Killary’s bloody footprints in Latin America
Hillary Clinton: Political psychopath, career criminal, root of all corruption (VIDEOS)
Condoleezza Rice (1954-)

Don’t be fooled by appearances and charme!

"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know

some of them, and they don't work"  M.Jordan

#12 stocks



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,443 posts

Posted 06 February 2017 - 12:05 PM

Demolishing feminist hypocrisy in 3 glorious minutes.



Why do liberals hate Christians and love Muslims?



#13 stocks



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,443 posts

Posted 14 February 2017 - 10:05 AM

1 in 4 Women take Anti-Depressants, Thanks to Feminism


The war on masculinity and men harms women and men. (But it hurts women more.)


Feminism has destroyed the nuclear family by marginalizing fathers and encouraging unrealistic expectations on women. Women do not have a realistic expectation of themselves or of the men they date or marry.


Women do not handle isolation and solitude as well as men do. Male authors do not outnumber female authors due to patriarchal discrimination. Writing is a solitary act, and women are more social than men are.


Women do not like weak men. They view them with contempt.













Why do liberals hate Christians and love Muslims?



#14 AChartist



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,851 posts

Posted 20 February 2017 - 10:47 PM

feminazi rainbow invades infowars, humor



"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know

some of them, and they don't work"  M.Jordan

#15 stocks



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,443 posts

Posted 17 March 2017 - 09:12 AM

Female Pathology - The Oedipal Mother won't let go and infantilizes her grown children.  



Why do liberals hate Christians and love Muslims?



#16 diogenes227



  • TT Patron+
  • 4,126 posts

Posted 20 March 2017 - 10:26 AM



How do you think Danish women are doing? And Swedish women?  And any of the women in the countries that rank above the U.S. in happiness.  Looking forward to your answer.


World Happiness Report


"If you've heard this story before, don't stop me because I'd like to hear it again," Groucho Marx.

I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol and wild women. The other half I wasted, W.C. Fields.

#17 stocks



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,443 posts

Posted 22 April 2017 - 06:57 AM

Gullible Huffington Post Falls for Hoax Article Calling for White Men to be Stripped of Voting Rights   


"Shelley Garland," a supposed “activist and feminist working on ways to smash the patriarchy” had suggested it was “time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.”  LOL


Hoaxster “Shelley” elaborates on how she conducted the ruse armed with a heavily photoshopped image taken from the Internet and phrases employed by the “less sensible left.” The hoaxster says that her editors at Huffington Post did not correct any of the false claims, factual errors and logical fallacies she purposely embedded in the piece, and accepted it without question.  


Apparently, anything will be published, even if it’s ‘liberally salted with nonsense, if it flatters the editors’ ideological preconceptions’.







Why do liberals hate Christians and love Muslims?



#18 stocks



  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,443 posts

Posted 17 July 2017 - 06:51 AM

Feminism is failing world-wide.




Brazil female president

South Korea female president




DNC Debbie Wasserman Schultz

DNC Donna Brazile




Hillary Clinton

Marine Le Pen

Teresa May




Donna Rice

Loretta Lynch

Huma Abedin

Hillary Clinton


Why do liberals hate Christians and love Muslims?