New Global Warming Scandal: 'Consensus' on Sun is One Expert
faked 'consensus' based on one finding.
the site reveals that the The IPCC relied on evidence supplied by just only one Solar Physicist, Judith Lean, to create their "consensus" that solar influence upon the climate was minimal.
Apparently, objections were raised to the IPCC by the Norwegian Government as early as the draft version in the preliminary phases of the IPCC’s draft of their Fourth Report of 2007, which won the organization the Nobel Peace Prize.
A total of six further peer-reviewed papers were dismissed by the IPCC for inclusion. At least one of the papers, by leading solar expert Hans Svensmark totally contradicted the IPCC’s conclusions that the Sun was not a key player in climate change.
Norwegian Government Snubbed By ‘Politicized’ IPCC
Citing evidence from the IPCC’s Fourth Report (AR4) second draft comments objections to the creation of a faked consensus among scientists was raised by scientitic representatives from the Norwegian Government which spotted the fraud.
Their noted objection reads: "I would encourage the IPCC to [re-]consider having only one solar physicist on the lead author team of such an important chapter. In particular since the conclusion of this section about solar forcing hangs on one single paper in which J. Lean is a coauthor. I find that this paper, which certainly can be correct, is given too much weight."
The IPCC dismissed the objections of the Norwegian government outright stating that any such changes would be “impractical.”
http://www.climatech...n-is-one-expert
IPCC Solar physicist agrees with herself
Started by
stocks
, Jun 25 2010 05:01 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 25 June 2010 - 05:01 PM
-- -
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change,
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change,
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.
#2
Posted 29 June 2010 - 06:23 PM
Thanks. Yet more shenanigans from the IPCC. Sheeze.
Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
https://book.stripe....1aut29V5edgrS03
You can now follow me on X
#3
Posted 06 July 2010 - 02:46 PM
UK Curbs ‘Binge Flying’ – To Aid Climate
Plane Stupid, an environmental group, called the British government’s decision “a turning point for aviation”
In a bold if lonely environmental stand, Britain’s coalition government has set out to curb the growth of what has been called “binge flying” by refusing to build new runways around London to accommodate more planes.
Heathrow, one of the world’s busiest airports and a major connection point for destinations in Europe, South Asia and the Middle East, is already notorious for its flight delays and endless lines. It is the only airport of its size with just two runways; Paris-Charles de Gaulle has four and O’Hare has seven…
Leo Murray, a spokesman for Plane Stupid, an environmental group that has fought new runways, called the British government’s decision “a turning point for aviation” although he added, “It is uncomfortable to have the coup de grace delivered by the Conservative government.”
http://sweetness-lig...-to-aid-climate
Plane Stupid, an environmental group, called the British government’s decision “a turning point for aviation”
In a bold if lonely environmental stand, Britain’s coalition government has set out to curb the growth of what has been called “binge flying” by refusing to build new runways around London to accommodate more planes.
Heathrow, one of the world’s busiest airports and a major connection point for destinations in Europe, South Asia and the Middle East, is already notorious for its flight delays and endless lines. It is the only airport of its size with just two runways; Paris-Charles de Gaulle has four and O’Hare has seven…
Leo Murray, a spokesman for Plane Stupid, an environmental group that has fought new runways, called the British government’s decision “a turning point for aviation” although he added, “It is uncomfortable to have the coup de grace delivered by the Conservative government.”
http://sweetness-lig...-to-aid-climate
-- -
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change,
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.
Defenders of the status quo are always stronger than reformers seeking change,
UNTIL the status quo self-destructs from its own corruption, and the reformers are free to build on its ashes.
#4
Posted 06 July 2010 - 06:26 PM
I guess planes circling for hours is somehow good for the environment.
:/
Mark S Young
Wall Street Sentiment
Get a free trial here:
https://book.stripe....1aut29V5edgrS03
You can now follow me on X










