1 reply to this topic

[maineman]

Here

[OEXCHAOS]

I fully disagree with the assertion that the carbon link evidence is even remotely convincing. I have yet to see one study that in fact explains the how trivial amounts of man made carbon dioxide are warming the planet when larger rises in the amounts of carbon dioxide seemed to FOLLOW temperature, rather than lead it. Association is not causation, but this argument doesn't have association going for it. There is recent coincidence but that doesn't really tell us much. So, we have much less warming than asserted, no real damage, and essentially a single data point that shows CO2 "leading" temperature. In the past it lagged. Is that reason to regulate carbon dioxide?