Jump to content



Photo

Boston - A Fish Rots From The Top


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#21 jack

jack

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 907 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 03:05 PM

You don't understand. It is only the RADICAL “Muslim terrorists.”

If all the bull s#!|| is believed. All anyone has to do is read their book of rules. Radical are the only ones raising up now, just wait till they all join hands.

How quickly we forget it was only radical Germans that took over. B.S.

mss


This post is very troubling. Linking pre war Germany to present America I Get. But mis directing us about just
who "joined hands" to allow Fascism is very troubling. There is a reason folks still quote Pogo.

"We have seen the Enemy.............."

#22 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,635 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:56 AM

Political Correctness Censorship Shields Islamic Terrorists

The government is more interested in playing political games than protecting you.

the FBI’s failure to look carefully and long enough at Tamerlan-the-terrorist has a lot to do with our leaders’ reluctance to call a terrorist a terrorist or to accept the fact that radical Islamist terrorists exist. The people who do counterterrorism shy away from seeing such terrorists, or potential terrorists, because if they point to such people, several bad things (from the investigators’ and analysts’ standpoint) happen. First, the policy makers aren’t going to do anything; second, the investigators and analysts aren’t going to get promoted, or rewarded with bonuses; third, they may get sued or sent to the bureaucratic equivalent of Siberia.


Benghazi - Lying to Protect Terrorists

There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama administration did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from accounts of the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission, which killed four people including the US ambassador to Libya.

This is the first hard evidence that the state department did ask for changes to the CIA's original assessment.

Specifically, they wanted this sentence removed: "We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa'ida participated in the attack."


http://www.bbc.co.uk...canada-22483768

--

Harvard types end up working for Wall Street to fleece the world, working for Deep State to perpetuate US globo-hegemony, and working in elite institutions to spread PC and subvert freedom of speech.


#23 voltaire

voltaire

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:02 AM

Political Correctness Censorship Shields Islamic Terrorists

The government is more interested in playing political games than protecting you.

the FBI’s failure to look carefully and long enough at Tamerlan-the-terrorist has a lot to do with our leaders’ reluctance to call a terrorist a terrorist or to accept the fact that radical Islamist terrorists exist. The people who do counterterrorism shy away from seeing such terrorists, or potential terrorists, because if they point to such people, several bad things (from the investigators’ and analysts’ standpoint) happen. First, the policy makers aren’t going to do anything; second, the investigators and analysts aren’t going to get promoted, or rewarded with bonuses; third, they may get sued or sent to the bureaucratic equivalent of Siberia.


Benghazi - Lying to Protect Terrorists

There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama administration did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from accounts of the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission, which killed four people including the US ambassador to Libya.

This is the first hard evidence that the state department did ask for changes to the CIA's original assessment.

Specifically, they wanted this sentence removed: "We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa'ida participated in the attack."


http://www.bbc.co.uk...canada-22483768



Except Obama went on 60 minutes, 2 days after the attack and said it was a terrorist attack.

Try to forget that.

#24 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,635 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 07:03 AM

Benghazi Coverup Uncovered

It has been plain almost since the beginning that the United States government has been dissembling about what happened on Sept. 11, 2012, when the U.S. mission in Benghazi was attacked and four people, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, were killed.

It has also been plain that most of the mainstream media has intentionally chosen to ignore, to downplay or to actively distort the possibility that the White House lied about Benghazi.

But when you get right down to it, the fault for the nation’s general ignorance about the Benghazi coverup does not belong to the media; it belongs to ourselves.

If any American doesn’t know by now that UN ambassador Susan Rice misled the world when she went on five Sunday morning talk shows and claimed that the Benghazi mission was attacked as the result of anger about a YouTube video, then they simply haven’t been doing their job as citizens. This information has been readily available to anyone who wanted it, and it’s no one else’s responsibility to make sure you are well-informed. Blaming the big media outlets only goes so far. “The fault ... is ... in ourselves, that we are underlings.”



http://www.dailyinte...1a4bcf887a.html

--

Harvard types end up working for Wall Street to fleece the world, working for Deep State to perpetuate US globo-hegemony, and working in elite institutions to spread PC and subvert freedom of speech.


#25 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,635 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 02:19 PM

There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama administration did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from accounts of the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission, which killed four people including the US ambassador to Libya.

This is the first hard evidence that the state department did ask for changes to the CIA's original assessment.

Specifically, they wanted this sentence removed: "We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa'ida participated in the attack."

They Blamed It On The Video

for the next two weeks, he went on a media blitz blaming a video, including in an interview recorded that day with "60 Minutes." In a segment that "60 Minutes" helpfully sat on for almost two months, Obama told Steve Kroft that "it's too early to know" whether the attack was terrorism. He then went on "The View," Univision and David Letterman pushing the idea that it was all about a video. At the United Nations, he condemned a "crude and disgusting" video but didn't mention terrorism.

Clinton followed suit. She told grieving family members of the fallen that the U.S. would track down the makers of the video. And, so far, the only person connected with the whole incident who has been punished is the filmmaker, who continues to languish in jail, admittedly on unrelated charges.


http://www.latimes.c...,6174154.column

--

Harvard types end up working for Wall Street to fleece the world, working for Deep State to perpetuate US globo-hegemony, and working in elite institutions to spread PC and subvert freedom of speech.


#26 *JB*

*JB*

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 848 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 02:48 PM

Except Obama went on 60 minutes, 2 days after the attack and said it was a terrorist attack.

Try to forget that.


Bull $h!t

“it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans.”

Obama on “60 Minutes” on Sept. 12 when asked if Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
"Don't think...LOOK!"
Carl Swenlin, founder of Decision Point and original Fearless Forecasters board.

#27 mss

mss

    I'M WATCHING

  • TT Sponsor
  • 6,166 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 04:15 PM

B) FWIW

CBS, ABC Presidents Have Siblings Working for Obama

Sunday, 12 May 2013 03:17 PM

http://www.newsmax.c...ePage/clear.gif

http://www.newsmax.c...ge/clear.gifThe presidents of ABC News and CBS News have siblings who work in the Obama administration and are involved with Benghazi.

Political consultant Richard Grenell told "Fox News Watch" that the ties raise concerns as to why the mainstream media has not
more aggressively pursued the story.

Story continues below video.

"I think the media's becoming the story, let's face it," Grenell said. "CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President
Ben Sherwood, both of them have siblings that not only work at the White House, that not only work for President Obama, but
they work at the (National Security Council) on foreign policy issues directly related to Benghazi. Let's call a spade a spade."

Rhodes' brother, Ben, is President Barack Obama's deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, and Sherwood's
sister, Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, is Obama's special assistant, Newsbusters reports.

Additionally, CNN deputy bureau chief Virginia Moseley is married to Hillary Clinton’s deputy, Tom Nides, Grenell noted. "It is
time for the media to start asking questions why are they not covering this. It's a family matter for some of them."

Nides is deputy secretary of state for management and resources.

ABC reported Friday that Rhodes, brother of the CBS News president, was key to revising the talking points that were issued
after the attack and are under scrutiny from a House subcommittee.

CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson has come under fire from her own employer for allegedly "wading dangerously close to
advocacy on" Benghazi."

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
WOMEN & CATS WILL DO AS THEY PLEASE, AND MEN & DOGS SHOULD GET USED TO THE IDEA.
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!

#28 Rogerdodger

Rogerdodger

    Member

  • TT Member*
  • 24,471 posts

Posted 15 May 2013 - 08:36 AM

So the government was spending resources harassing "patriots", supporters of the US Constitution,
But it was too busy to watch someone known by Russia to be a potential terrorist, and people died.

So the government was spending resources harassing "patriots", supporters of the US Constitution,
But it was too busy to send help to an American Ambassador in Benghazi, and people died.

So the government was spending resources buying up ammunition to interfere with the 2nd amendment,
while giving automatic weapons to drug gangs across the border, and people died.

So the A.P. press was spending resources watching the President play golf with Tiger Woods,
and couldn't report on any of these stories...until they and the 1st amendment were the targets.

So the President didn't know about any of this until he read about it in the newspaper this week.

Edited by Rogerdodger, 15 May 2013 - 08:48 AM.


#29 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,635 posts

Posted 17 May 2013 - 03:58 PM

Administration's Change in Tone

The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments.

“We’re portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots,” said one Obama administration official who was part of the Benghazi response. “It’s actually closer to us being idiots.”
:lol: :lol: :lol:


http://hotair.com/ar...s-being-idiots/

--

Harvard types end up working for Wall Street to fleece the world, working for Deep State to perpetuate US globo-hegemony, and working in elite institutions to spread PC and subvert freedom of speech.


#30 stocks

stocks

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 3,635 posts

Posted 25 May 2013 - 06:39 AM

Why did British bystanders watch a soldier get hacked to death?

“Why didn’t anyone try to help the victim?”

Because British citizens are prohibited from carrying objects that could be used as “offensive weapons.”

While it is well known that Brits cannot carry guns, a lesser known law prohibits any subject of the Queen from carrying a knife of consequence, pepper spray or a stun gun.

Folding knives, regardless of blade size, with a locking mechanism are illegal in the U.K. for carry in public and are referred to as “lock knives.” According to British law, “The maximum penalty for an adult carrying a knife is 4 years in prison and a fine of £5,000.”

Pepper spray is also illegal under section the Firearms Act 1968, which prohibits “any weapon of whatever description designed or adapted for the discharge of any noxious liquid, gas or other thing.”




Read more: http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz2UIrelX79

--

Harvard types end up working for Wall Street to fleece the world, working for Deep State to perpetuate US globo-hegemony, and working in elite institutions to spread PC and subvert freedom of speech.