9 replies to this topic

[iloli way]

Bad to the bone

On the day I was born
The nurses all gathered 'round
And they gazed in wide wonder
At the joy they had found
The head nurse spoke up
Said "Leave this one alone !"
She could tell right away
That I was bad to the bone

Bad to the bone
Bad to the bone
B-B-B-B-Bad
B-B-B-B-Bad
B-B-B-B-Bad
Bad to the bone

[draggen33]

Please pardon my ignorance , yet I just to make sure I understand you . Top is at 1710 sp or it is already in . Thanks in advance i do enjoy your posts they are a must read

[pdx5]

I think a week or two more before any correction.

[thespookyone]

Just relax. Have one Bourbon, one shot, and one beer-and see what happens when a pattern fails..

[PrintFaster]

When does that all-important Chinese data supposed to come out tonight?

[redfoliage2]

When does that all-important Chinese data supposed to come out tonight?

Don't count on the data from China which just a bunch of outrageous lies.

[iloli way]

Facing Part 4 next is bare to the dry bone simplicity.

3 options:

If price BO the Monthly/Weekly Top Line and more so taking off like a rocket again, that would mean the unprecedented QEs finally trigger the SEA CHANGE GAME. The WWIII in also unprecedented disguising style, will escalate much higher in the witnesses of the same great war Generation B again.

There's still time for other 2 options: NOT to BO (swing inside of channel); or BO and crash like '87.

Just talking charts here.

[iloli way]

OK, that's COLD EYE analysis. Here's RED EYE one.

If I were the PTB, which option should I take?

Look at chart, BO is against the history less than 2% odds. BUT, if I just want to BO the top line and make SEA CHANGE, the hec just DO it.

'87 firstly is not a sound model to take on as BO case, unless 'crash' is the scheme of things. If I only want squeeze the hell out, does it warrant the breaking of 26 years of laws of line and still be able to reap a desired crops afterward? If not so sure...yet just want to levitate higher, hug or climb below the top line (upper TL) without BO will do just fine. This week's top line limit's at 1710; next week 1713.5; week after.... and so on, higher and higher without breaking the LOL.

As for ST, and IT both need corrections soon, so I'll initiate another dry-run like 5/22 and 6/19, since markets already tasted my 'back paddling', let's go swing the channel baby. Good for redistribute wealth for whoever in the knows, healthy for the markets, just rinse and repeat the big Bubble Waves since 2000.

That's why I think BO of that (monthly/weekly) upper TL (Top Line) is not the best choice.

That is IF I were the Chairman, and you asked me.

Thanks for interested in my "must read" draggen33, flattered (yikes) and hope I've answered you.

Red and Print, sure we should trust ALL OTHER governments mambo jumbos, NOT. As long as printing can keep china to fill up walmart and american (welfare state) dream, what else is more important? Why you never see me FA posting.

spooky, you missed the 26 yr old 'one Scotch'? Put a gun to head, what "fails" means? BO or BD the channel?

Edited by I Lo Li 愛樂利, 15 July 2013 - 04:23 PM.

[iloli way]

I think a week or two more before any correction.

Forgot to point out, 1710 this week, 1714 next week, if we touch them in the time frame the odds is 98% we'll get a reversal down.

It's all in the two charts posted here.

Edited by I Lo Li 愛樂利, 15 July 2013 - 08:35 PM.

[iloli way]

More evidence: I'm still not rejected by "short the next line-rejection until new highs debunk it". Also as i pointed out in Part3 that "when Zarathustra also sprach, bears should listen", so far he has not spoken, not in this chart captured minutes ago as you can see: