
mss
Posted 12 September 2007 - 09:13 AM

Posted 12 September 2007 - 09:18 AM
Edited by hiker, 12 September 2007 - 09:19 AM.
Posted 12 September 2007 - 09:40 AM
Posted 12 September 2007 - 09:58 AM
Posted 12 September 2007 - 10:04 AM
....... maybe it was Tea or you mss.
Edited by mss, 12 September 2007 - 10:05 AM.
Posted 12 September 2007 - 10:05 AM
Posted 12 September 2007 - 10:19 AM
Posted 12 September 2007 - 11:07 AM
Posted 12 September 2007 - 11:19 AM
mss, I am new here, however, have followed and enjoyed your great charting ability for awhile, I really respect you. Charting is always about looking back. Had we draw a dotted RED line from same July high thru Aug 24 high and down, can we say the actions since late Aug already broke that RED line? Consequently, price bounced exactly off that line, a support now, on Sept 10? Similarly, we could draw the top triangle BLUE line thru Aug 24 top, and that TRIANGLE was also had a breakout at late Aug? Question here maybe this, if we keep drawing new triangles after price rises, when will it become un-reliable? Thanks!There are only two triangle patterns, IMO, at the present. Like any pattern, they are very reliable until they are broken. TL, pivots, channels, fib #, etc. But for me triangles have more valid boundries, till broken.
The chart below shows what I see. The horz. are pivot points and the intersection of the triangle and upper pivot is very meaningful, if a upside breakout, or failure. IMO the RED line should give us an early clue.
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$SPX&p=D&yr=0&mn=3&dy=0&i=p61289556629&a=116507500&r=3289.png
Those are closing prices, and the current point is assumed to be closeing as it updates.
mss
Posted 12 September 2007 - 12:10 PM
Question here maybe this, if we keep drawing new triangles after price rises, when will it become un-reliable?