cycles
#1
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:15 PM
Outspeaks the Squire, "Give room, I pray,
And hie the terriers in;
The warriors of the fight are they,
And every fight they win".
Ring-Ouzel, England
#2
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:29 PM
#3
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:47 PM
Outspeaks the Squire, "Give room, I pray,
And hie the terriers in;
The warriors of the fight are they,
And every fight they win".
Ring-Ouzel, England
#4
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:55 PM
The future is 90% present and 10% vision.
#5
Posted 04 January 2008 - 03:07 PM
#6
Posted 04 January 2008 - 03:34 PM
Many group and several major indexes are at, just below or nearing major LT support. It does look like some sort of IT rally is near. That's unless we have a 1998 style ST liquidity event which causes a sharp selloff.
Either that, or we're going to break those LT supports with a bang as weekly/'monthly charts break down.
Edited by ogm, 04 January 2008 - 03:35 PM.
#7
Posted 04 January 2008 - 03:51 PM
agree - trin set up nearly identical too - end of aug 98 formed first low in about a week followed by one mo 61.8 retrace - fyi, the IT rally kicked off after fast drop to a second lower lowMany group and several major indexes are at, just below or nearing major LT support. It does look like some sort of IT rally is near. That's unless we have a 1998 style ST liquidity event which causes a sharp selloff.
I wonder how airedales cycles lined up in 98?
Edited by sglasson, 04 January 2008 - 03:56 PM.
#8
Posted 04 January 2008 - 04:11 PM
Outspeaks the Squire, "Give room, I pray,
And hie the terriers in;
The warriors of the fight are they,
And every fight they win".
Ring-Ouzel, England
#9
Posted 04 January 2008 - 07:05 PM
april 04 to oct 98 4.5 yr cycle bottom to bottom.
April 04 plus 4.5 years would imply another low on October 08, wouldn't it?
gis
#10
Posted 04 January 2008 - 07:48 PM
It's a typo. I think he meant April 94.April 04 plus 4.5 years would imply another low on October 08, wouldn't it?










