the 76 year solunar cycle discovered 2300 years ago

i "re-discovered" this fascinating cycle while researching solar/lunar (solunar) cycles years ago. this one was first discovered by the greek, callippus, in 330 bc. it is also four metonic (the 19 year) cycles. it's half cycle from 1932 hit in 1970 (remember the 1970 low?) and the full cycle hit in 2008 (the massacre of 2008).


http://en.wikipedia....Callippic_cycle


cycles sometimes overlap and underlap and are often not chained, so beware. there is also a 60/120 year cycle, recently also called a "kress cycle". it does have 20 year subcycles. it hits in 2014 and tags the 1994 low (the 20 year artifact), the 1974 low (the 40 artifact), the 1954 econ low, and, 120 years ago, the important 1894 low.

cycles are not easy as it is, but mixing and mashing and mushing them is downright toxic!

i "re-discovered" this fascinating cycle while researching solar/lunar (solunar) cycles years ago. this one was first discovered by the greek, callippus, in 330 bc. it is also four metonic (the 19 year) cycles. it's half cycle from 1932 hit in 1970 (remember the 1970 low?) and the full cycle hit in 2008 (the massacre of 2008).


http://en.wikipedia....Callippic_cycle


cycles sometimes overlap and underlap and are often not chained, so beware. there is also a 60/120 year cycle, recently also called a "kress cycle". it does have 20 year subcycles. it hits in 2014 and tags the 1994 low (the 20 year artifact), the 1974 low (the 40 artifact), the 1954 econ low, and, 120 years ago, the important 1894 low.

cycles are not easy as it is, but mixing and mashing and mushing them is downright toxic!

I posted on those cycles back in 2007, do a search on 235 new moons. That is why I called a super cycle top due in 2007 between 1550 and 1610. You may recall at the time I posted that I took a lot of grief from the bulls, going to 1800 they said. Uh-Huh and the low is in at 741, new bull market, never going to see 790 again, yeah right.

LOL: you discovered the 19 year solunar in 2007?

this guy beat you to it:

http://scienceworld....tonicCycle.html

oops!

™

LOL: you discovered the 19 year solunar in 2007?

this guy beat you to it:

http://scienceworld....tonicCycle.html

oops!

™

Did I say I discovered the cycle....NO.... I said I posted about the cycle. Knew about the 235 new moon and the other relationships for a long time. Do the 235 new moon search.

my point, LT, is simply that the cycle has been known for 2400 years and what does it matter that you posted something about it, LOL? and who said we would "never" see 790 again? there are many moons betwixt this coming stunning rally and the denouement. who knows? but, i hereby give you SOLE ownership of spx 89 (sic) which was on the chart you posted within the last day or so.

Edited by humble1, 16 February 2009 - 08:59 AM.

Thanks for the information LT and H1. I am eternally grateful.