this guy is seeing a possible 1987 replica
#1
Posted 08 March 2010 - 02:12 PM
http://blog.capitalmarketvision.com/
he says that two consecutive doji candles would rise suspects of a 1987 replica.
What I think is this won' t happen even though a plunge to me is probable despite
Bald Pecus Bill . Pecus from Latin word pecus,pecoris respectively nominative and
genitive of the word that in English is translated as ''sheep''.
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard
#2
Posted 08 March 2010 - 02:37 PM
the link is.... here :
http://blog.capitalmarketvision.com/
he says that two consecutive doji candles would rise suspects of a 1987 replica.
What I think is this won' t happen even though a plunge to me is probable despite
Bald Pecus Bill . Pecus from Latin word pecus,pecoris respectively nominative and
genitive of the word that in English is translated as ''sheep''.
i am pretty sure the advance decliners in 87 were already projecting weakness ahead of price but dont quote me i was still chasing sorority girls back then
#3
Posted 08 March 2010 - 02:47 PM
the link is.... here :
http://blog.capitalmarketvision.com/
he says that two consecutive doji candles would rise suspects of a 1987 replica.
What I think is this won' t happen even though a plunge to me is probable despite
Bald Pecus Bill . Pecus from Latin word pecus,pecoris respectively nominative and
genitive of the word that in English is translated as ''sheep''.
doubt it the summation is very positive here. I doubt it was in 1987.
The future is 90% present and 10% vision.
#4
Posted 08 March 2010 - 02:50 PM
the link is.... here :
http://blog.capitalmarketvision.com/
he says that two consecutive doji candles would rise suspects of a 1987 replica.
What I think is this won' t happen even though a plunge to me is probable despite
Bald Pecus Bill . Pecus from Latin word pecus,pecoris respectively nominative and
genitive of the word that in English is translated as ''sheep''.
i am pretty sure the advance decliners in 87 were already projecting weakness ahead of price but dont quote me i was still chasing sorority girls back then
heck I am 48 and still chasing them:) just kidding..
#5
Posted 08 March 2010 - 06:18 PM
I was in the market in '87 and made a lot of money then on far out of the money OEX puts. This market doesn't look at all like '87, even superficially. Then, the bonds had been trading down for well over year. Today, the bonds are just starting a downtrend. Volatility all through October was extreme even frighteningly so. Consecutive up and down days of 2-5% were common. Today we'd be talking about down days of 250 DOW points followed by 250 point up days and spiked with a couple of 500 point days here and there in short succession. And that would be preceding a pre-climax day of a thousand points! Obviously, that doesn't describe today's market. The best (worst) that can be said is it is similar to the July-August '87 run-up (without the bond debacle). No, this doesn't look like '87. It's a different animal altogether, maybe even more frighteneing.the link is.... here :
http://blog.capitalmarketvision.com/
he says that two consecutive doji candles would rise suspects of a 1987 replica.
What I think is this won' t happen even though a plunge to me is probable despite
Bald Pecus Bill . Pecus from Latin word pecus,pecoris respectively nominative and
genitive of the word that in English is translated as ''sheep''.
doubt it the summation is very positive here. I doubt it was in 1987.










