Jump to content



Photo

What gives? gold or miners?


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#21 beta

beta

    lasergirl

  • TT Patron+
  • 4,091 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 12:58 PM

Anyone getting seasick yet? Women and children first ... Now I understand why so many drowned on the Titanic. ------

Edited by beta, 05 March 2013 - 01:00 PM.

"Daytrading -- An Extreme Sport !"

#22 stubaby

stubaby

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,660 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 03:13 PM

Anyone getting seasick yet? Women and children first ...

Now I understand why so many drowned on the Titanic.

------



:D

#23 senorBS

senorBS

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 10,958 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

Anyone getting seasick yet? Women and children first ...

Now I understand why so many drowned on the Titanic.

------



:D


IMO everything necessary for a grande bottom is now in place, I bot this mornin in the miners at the Fibos, stops are decently below those Fibos. Now it's up to the price action to tell the story.

BSing away

Senor

#24 SemiBizz

SemiBizz

    Volume Dynamics Specialist

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 23,208 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:41 AM

as you said, the range was for years , so it seems UNLIKELy that the MAGIC number is 131 instead of a broader range that the charts show persisted for years


it's 131 here, doing a consolidation. Setting up another move down.
Price and Volume Forensics Specialist

Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"

Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.

http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics  http://parler.com/Volumedynamics

#25 senorBS

senorBS

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 10,958 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 10:44 AM

as you said, the range was for years , so it seems UNLIKELy that the MAGIC number is 131 instead of a broader range that the charts show persisted for years


it's 131 here, doing a consolidation. Setting up another move down.


sorry amigo, don't this so

Senor

#26 dougie

dougie

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9,056 posts

Posted 06 March 2013 - 02:36 PM

its 131 where?

as you said, the range was for years , so it seems UNLIKELy that the MAGIC number is 131 instead of a broader range that the charts show persisted for years


it's 131 here, doing a consolidation. Setting up another move down.



#27 senorBS

senorBS

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 10,958 posts

Posted 07 March 2013 - 09:43 AM

sideways gold and silver trading and collapsing mining stocks. The 64peso Q is which one is telling the real story. Is gold and silver about done with their correction and the miner collapse nearing a climax? or are the miners leading the way south with gold and silver to follow muy rapido? weekly miner stuff is as oversold as anytime since mid 90's. something's gotta give amigos. HUI/Gold ratio now lowest since early 2001.

PureBS

Senor


seems the answer, at least for now, is gold and silver were telling the real story while miners were in their dearh throes of capitulation.

Now I want to see gold move norte of 1600 and silver norte of 30, do that and we got something real

PureBS

Senor

#28 dougie

dougie

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9,056 posts

Posted 07 March 2013 - 12:01 PM

remains an open question metals NON-conforming here to be sure! Miners? dead cat bounce

#29 SemiBizz

SemiBizz

    Volume Dynamics Specialist

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 23,208 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:40 AM

its 131 where?

as you said, the range was for years , so it seems UNLIKELy that the MAGIC number is 131 instead of a broader range that the charts show persisted for years


it's 131 here, doing a consolidation. Setting up another move down.



130.82, going to consolidate the low 127.XX
Price and Volume Forensics Specialist

Richard Wyckoff - "Whenever you find hope or fear warping judgment, close out your position"

Volume is the only vote that matters... the ultimate sentiment poll.

http://twitter.com/VolumeDynamics  http://parler.com/Volumedynamics

#30 senorBS

senorBS

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 10,958 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:54 AM

its 131 where?

as you said, the range was for years , so it seems UNLIKELy that the MAGIC number is 131 instead of a broader range that the charts show persisted for years


it's 131 here, doing a consolidation. Setting up another move down.



130.82, going to consolidate the low 127.XX


or maybe we just made a secondary low and norte she goes? we see

Senor