Many here went fully long yesterday
#1
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:08 AM
#2
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:28 AM
Edited by hiker, 22 March 2007 - 09:33 AM.
#3
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:35 AM
as written, this poll ask anyone who is currently long to answer...did you mean to inquire only of those who are fully long?
I answered long before the FED, but am far from fully long. Am long stocks, not ETF's etc.
some of us have stayed long some stocks since 2004 and more in 2006...hope you realize this poll asks for data that is not limited to entry date.
more than short term traders and swing traders exist in this population of traders
"near the bottom" was March 2003 or 1930's..ask da chief
True, but I was refering to the recent spike in fully long positions. It increased dramatically yesterday. I think near the lows, it was like 3-4 people, then it went to like 17.. even yesterday it was like 8 people. So like 10 people went fully long yesterday, just curious what the entry was.
#4
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:44 AM
Edited by hiker, 22 March 2007 - 09:45 AM.
#5
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:50 AM
curious about entry in what? cause the other poll to which you are referring does not define what type of trading vehicle in which a trader is long or short
could be:
futures
ETF's
stocks
do not know how this mixed bag would help a Q's trader or futures trader assess the market timing skills of the population that answered..some of us trade stocks which do not require short term shifts based on market timing...
CLF
FSLR
U.TO
just a few examples of a couple in which short-term traders would have missed the majority of the move, unless extremely vigilant
Well it doesn't matter what they went in.. practically everything went up.
Again, I'm just curious to the timing. There was a large shift yesterday, and there's obviously many issues about it.
1) Yes the data is true, and majority here are excellent timers, therefore they all got in before Fed.
2) No the data is false, and only reflects that closet bulls were willing to come out after it went up, hence they were always fully long (through the decline) or were at the bottom.
So there's many possibilities. This poll is just an attempt to clarify it.
#6
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:27 AM
the question was whether anyone knew of studies that address trading profits related duration in the specific trade method/strategy for the trades in the study population
I answered that this guy's site a couple years ago had such studies available to the public for trend following as Michael defined the entry and exit method...and that he has since written a book and the study may no longer be available...this guy's technique as defined a couple of years ago does work to keep a trader in a trade for the entire duration of the run..and/or gets the trader back in when appropriate
http://www.michaelcovel.com/
#7
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:46 AM
#8
Posted 22 March 2007 - 12:18 PM