3 replies to this topic

[relax]

Is this the first time that the direction of an Armstrong turning point was reversed with a new high just two months after the turning point? Furthermore is this the first time the turning point was not followed by a +10 per cent move? Next turning point is set for march 2008 - the previous turning point turned out to be a move down - does this mean the next turning point has to be a move up? A lot of questions - it seems like a lot of rules are currently being mocked I guess da boyz are just doing their job

[da_cheif]

Is this the first time that the direction of an Armstrong turning point was reversed with a new high just two months after the turning point?

Furthermore is this the first time the turning point was not followed by a +10 per cent move?

Next turning point is set for march 2008 - the previous turning point turned out to be a move down - does this mean the next turning point has to be a move up?

A lot of questions - it seems like a lot of rules are currently being mocked

I guess da boyz are just doing their job

RULES?????....what rules?...

[relax]

;-)

well the rule for armstrong's turning points have been a move of more than 10 per cent

Is this the first time that the direction of an Armstrong turning point was reversed with a new high just two months after the turning point?

Furthermore is this the first time the turning point was not followed by a +10 per cent move?

Next turning point is set for march 2008 - the previous turning point turned out to be a move down - does this mean the next turning point has to be a move up?

A lot of questions - it seems like a lot of rules are currently being mocked

I guess da boyz are just doing their job

RULES?????....what rules?...

[Russ]

well the rule for armstrong's turning points have been a move of more than 10 per cent

Any indicator is more of a probability than a hard rule.