Jump to content



Photo

bradley - what's up


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 relax

relax

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:31 PM

Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember

#2 n83

n83

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,086 posts

Posted 27 April 2007 - 06:40 PM

Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work

next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember


does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal

seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20

#3 relax

relax

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:48 AM

So which way should bradley be used

Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?

For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up

Thanks for anyone's input




Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work

next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember


does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal

seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20



#4 n83

n83

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,086 posts

Posted 28 April 2007 - 06:08 AM

So which way should bradley be used

Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?

For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up

Thanks for anyone's input




Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work

next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember


does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal

seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20


the bradley chart imo should not be a chart

it should simply be a timeline

the folks who draw it up say it only represents points in time and not polarity ie low can be high high can be low

then why the heck they draw it as a chart

just draw it as a simple horizontal timeline

that is what it is

#5 relax

relax

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 28 April 2007 - 07:58 AM

I agree - a bit like the armstrong chart

But how should the chart be used?

When the date is reached, then one knows that a big move should come +-4 days maybe even a week

Will this move then set the trend until the next date?


So which way should bradley be used

Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?

For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up

Thanks for anyone's input




Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work

next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember


does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal

seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20


the bradley chart imo should not be a chart

it should simply be a timeline

the folks who draw it up say it only represents points in time and not polarity ie low can be high high can be low

then why the heck they draw it as a chart

just draw it as a simple horizontal timeline

that is what it is