bradley - what's up
#1
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:31 PM
#2
Posted 27 April 2007 - 06:40 PM
Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work
next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember
does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal
seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20
#3
Posted 28 April 2007 - 04:48 AM
Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?
For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up
Thanks for anyone's input
Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work
next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember
does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal
seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20
#4
Posted 28 April 2007 - 06:08 AM
So which way should bradley be used
Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?
For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up
Thanks for anyone's input
Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work
next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember
does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal
seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20
the bradley chart imo should not be a chart
it should simply be a timeline
the folks who draw it up say it only represents points in time and not polarity ie low can be high high can be low
then why the heck they draw it as a chart
just draw it as a simple horizontal timeline
that is what it is
#5
Posted 28 April 2007 - 07:58 AM
But how should the chart be used?
When the date is reached, then one knows that a big move should come +-4 days maybe even a week
Will this move then set the trend until the next date?
So which way should bradley be used
Would it be correct to look at the first big move after the date and then assume that the direction of this move will at least be the trend until the next date?
For instance first big move after 4/20 was up, so the trend until 5/4 will be up
Thanks for anyone's input
Bradley turning point for 4/20 didn't really work
next one set for 5/4 as far as I remember
does not necess have to be a turn as in reversal
seems breakout occurred on/around 4/20
the bradley chart imo should not be a chart
it should simply be a timeline
the folks who draw it up say it only represents points in time and not polarity ie low can be high high can be low
then why the heck they draw it as a chart
just draw it as a simple horizontal timeline
that is what it is