Jump to content



Photo

Q's on a roll..........as in over


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 johngeorge

johngeorge

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 4,616 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 03:51 PM

QQQQ Negative divergences on every indicator



NASI Lower low with lower highs. Negative divergences on indicators with 9 day ema crossover.
Peace
johngeorge

#2 arbman

arbman

    Quant

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 19,504 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 04:25 PM

What is the prime difference between an ending consolidation and a beginning downtrend? Just asking...

#3 johngeorge

johngeorge

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 4,616 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 04:42 PM

What is the prime difference between an ending consolidation and a beginning downtrend? Just asking...




Good question and I dont have an answer for you............However, to me it depends on where the market is coming from. After the recent rally with negative divergences indicate a downtrend to begin, not an ending consolidation for another move up. I will also add here that the seasonals for the market this time of the year are not favorable. And I have been wrong before :blush:
Peace
johngeorge

#4 relax

relax

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,224 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 05:31 PM

well negative divergences don't really indicate a downtrend, just indicate that the trend is weakening

a true downtrend is when we get markets are going down without divergences

next week will be big and decide whether we break these negative divergences and continue the uptrend or if we start some sort of correction, which then may turn into a downtrend


What is the prime difference between an ending consolidation and a beginning downtrend? Just asking...




Good question and I dont have an answer for you............However, to me it depends on where the market is coming from. After the recent rally with negative divergences indicate a downtrend to begin, not an ending consolidation for another move up. I will also add here that the seasonals for the market this time of the year are not favorable. And I have been wrong before :blush:



#5 skott

skott

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 4,712 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 05:39 PM

I think if you go back and look at the rally from the July lows until Feb you will see negative divergences thru that whole move. stayed overbought the whole time. btw, up 22 of the last 25 on the dow? that's the best since 1929!

#6 jjc

jjc

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,886 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 05:43 PM

Ask any day trader if it is a good idea to trade divergences on a strong trend day and they will tell you "it's a good way to get run over". This market is breaking a lot historic patterns on its way up (plenty of up-fuel), and it is trending strongly; I'm not sure mean reversion is the ideal trading strategy at this time.

#7 jmicou

jmicou

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,749 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 06:12 PM

QQQQ Negative divergences on every indicator



NASI Lower low with lower highs. Negative divergences on indicators with 9 day ema crossover.


Put the COMPQ behind the NASI on your chart, then study the lead/lag time, as well as divergences. For the Qs, use the NDX and NDX Volume McClellans.

When looking at other indicators for divergences, also take into account lead/lag.

#8 johngeorge

johngeorge

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 4,616 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 06:27 PM

I think if you go back and look at the rally from the July lows until Feb you will see negative divergences thru that whole move. stayed overbought the whole time. btw, up 22 of the last 25 on the dow? that's the best since 1929!





DIA is as you say. Beautiful double bottom last summer and up it went despite being overbought, but of course, finally corrected in March of this year. Now the Dow is the stronger index than IWM or QQQQ which is a warning sign in and of itself. Generals leading the troops and all that. So I am looking for a correction in the Q's to begin soon perhaps after next weeks meeting. However, in the longer term (late this year or early next year) I believe we have higher to go in the Q's as technology makes a comeback. Meanwhile with what looks to me to be a strengthening dollar and the "sell in May and go away" crowd we pull back in the Q's to fib 32.8% ~ $42 or fib 50% ~ $41 retracement of present rally from July.



QQQQ Negative divergences on every indicator



NASI Lower low with lower highs. Negative divergences on indicators with 9 day ema crossover.


Put the COMPQ behind the NASI on your chart, then study the lead/lag time, as well as divergences. For the Qs, use the NDX and NDX Volume McClellans.

When looking at other indicators for divergences, also take into account lead/lag.





Thank you :) and I'll heed that advice.
Peace
johngeorge

#9 jmicou

jmicou

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 2,749 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 06:30 PM

I think if you go back and look at the rally from the July lows until Feb you will see negative divergences thru that whole move. stayed overbought the whole time. btw, up 22 of the last 25 on the dow? that's the best since 1929!





DIA is as you say. Beautiful double bottom last summer and up it went despite being overbought, but of course, finally corrected in March of this year. Now the Dow is the stronger index than IWM or QQQQ which is a warning sign in and of itself. Generals leading the troops and all that. So I am looking for a correction in the Q's to begin soon perhaps after next weeks meeting. However, in the longer term (late this year or early next year) I believe we have higher to go in the Q's as technology makes a comeback. Meanwhile with what looks to me to be a strengthening dollar and the "sell in May and go away" crowd we pull back in the Q's to fib 32.8% ~ $42 or fib 50% ~ $41 retracement of present rally from July.



QQQQ Negative divergences on every indicator



NASI Lower low with lower highs. Negative divergences on indicators with 9 day ema crossover.


Put the COMPQ behind the NASI on your chart, then study the lead/lag time, as well as divergences. For the Qs, use the NDX and NDX Volume McClellans.

When looking at other indicators for divergences, also take into account lead/lag.





Thank you :) and I'll heed that advice.

You may also want to read Sullivan's remarks on May 1st.

#10 johngeorge

johngeorge

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 4,616 posts

Posted 03 May 2007 - 06:39 PM

You may also want to read Sullivan's remarks on May 1st.




Thanks for the link, good informative read.
Peace
johngeorge