Jump to content



Photo

Q's


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 01:17 AM

The way I see it......52-56 is the next target above the channel.

:redbull: :redbull:


http://stockcharts.c...0165&r=1409.png

#2 traderpaul

traderpaul

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,034 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 02:13 AM

If the index is making all time high.....Why the RSI is below 70?....and......MCAD is turning down?....and....QID (Q short) went up with the COMPQ up 9 points Friday while the QLD (Q long) went down???

Edited by traderpaul, 03 June 2007 - 02:23 AM.

"Inflation is taking place now. Prices may not appear to be rising because they are making packaging smaller. "— Rickoshay

#3 ...

...

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 510 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 05:36 AM

Why [did] (...) QID (Q short) went up with the COMPQ up 9 points Friday while the QLD (Q long) went down???


Ah, could it be because the Nasdaq Composite index is a separate and almost completely different index than the Nasdaq 100 (the NDX being a subset of the Nasdaq Composite) or its NDX/QQQQ derivatives, QID and QLD?

QID/QLD were up/down mere pennies, just as the NDX was approximately unchanged. It's always good to understand what underlies any given derivative before forming conclusions about either.

#4 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 07:31 AM

If the index is making all time high.....Why the RSI is below 70?....and......MCAD is turning down?....and....QID (Q short) went up with the COMPQ up 9 points Friday while the QLD (Q long) went down???




MACD has been down....it is now turning and crossing up. RSI fell because
the parabolic ended.....now the consolidation is over.

#5 thespookyone

thespookyone

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,043 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 10:16 AM

"MACD has been down....it is now turning and crossing up. RSI fell because the parabolic ended.....now the consolidation is over." I guess if you start out with a premise-you start adding things up to justify it. First, that appears to be a fairly creative uptrend line you drew across the top points-you seem to like to not draw across the actual peak, from the very start-and allowed "quite a bit" of room on that Feb 06 area, no? Of course if those lines were drawn across the actual tops-it probably wouldn't have broken out of the channel-but smacked into the top again-in this case into multi year resistance, hmmm. To me the negative divergence "is what it is" on the macd and rsi-and I feel no need to explain them away. But, while you attempt to "smooth out the bumps here", what about VOLUME? Why is it that the huge sticks are almost exclusively on down days? And what about the ADX-where is this buying pressure hiding that will cause this big push up?

Edited by thespookyone, 03 June 2007 - 10:20 AM.


#6 selecto

selecto

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,871 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 12:24 PM

Decision Point: With the ascending wedge the two boundary lines move upward with the lower line having the steepest angle of ascent. This formation will normally resolve downward because the steepest angle of ascent is usually the least sustainable.

Hmmmmm. Have we gone too deep?

[attachment=5629:attachment]

#7 CLK

CLK

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,787 posts

Posted 03 June 2007 - 02:12 PM

The line drawn in the above chart was to point out the false
breaks, which were many.

http://stockcharts.c...5128&r=1124.png

Edited by CLK, 03 June 2007 - 02:15 PM.