why do prices fall faster
#1
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:20 PM
The future is 90% present and 10% vision.
#2
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:31 PM
JV
#3
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:33 PM
i am just curious to know any explanation.
Theoretically should fall at same speed as rises.
Thanks.
I think it might be gravity?
#4
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:42 PM
Humans are slow to embrace constructive change, but quick to panic.Theoretically should fall at same speed as rises.
Not having control, nor knowing what the future holds, are both prominent in both of these emotional (price) reactions and come in varying degrees. This is what causes compression in many of the analytical tools and price patterns we use as technicians that forecast such events in the first place, and the assumed reaction based on past indications of similar set ups.
Fib
Better to ignore me than abhor me.
“Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it” - Benjamin Franklin
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw
Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices, false claims and promises in order to gain power.
Technical Watch Subscriptions
#5
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:51 PM
"In order to master the markets, you must first master yourself" ... JP Morgan
"Most people lose money because they cannot admit they are wrong"... Martin Armstrong
http://marketvisions.blogspot.com/
#6
Posted 07 June 2007 - 02:54 PM
i am just curious to know any explanation.
Theoretically should fall at same speed as rises.
Thanks.
Not willing to buy when people wont to sell = decline, does not need a lot of vol.
Not willing to sell when people wont to buy = rise, does need some vol.
Simply put, prices can fall without help, but need help to rise.
JMHOFWIW,
mss
A DOG ALWAYS OFFERS UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. CATS HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT!!
#7
Posted 07 June 2007 - 03:06 PM
#8
Posted 07 June 2007 - 03:11 PM
#10
Posted 07 June 2007 - 04:15 PM
i am just curious to know any explanation.
Theoretically should fall at same speed as rises.
Thanks.
I think that it has less to do with market psychology than with simple fact that after years of accumulations, institutions have just more shares to offload in a changing market.