Jump to content



Photo

I just love Fib's EW guidelines


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Remo

Remo

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 136 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:09 AM

2nd waves are ''reinforcement'' waves that seem to confirm the overall feeling of wave 1. In this example, those who suggested that more downside was coming during wave 1, will come back to those same people and say ''I told you so''. The other characteristic of 2nd waves is that the level of anxiety will generally be more acute than it was prior to beginning of wave 1, but now at higher price levels that were seen at the actual bottom. Because of this, retracements will tend to be deep. Technically, the tools mentioned above would be snapping back to what were the breakout areas that confirmed a possible change in direction in which took place in wave 1. All of this action is in spring board preparation from which 3rd waves begin.



"I told you so"

Now, where have I been hearing tha latelyt?!

One "wonder to behold" coming up shortly :P

:redbull: :redbull: :redbull:

Edited by Remo, 29 August 2007 - 06:12 AM.


#2 BigBadBear

BigBadBear

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,007 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:22 AM

right on track. we will retrace about 80% of ydays decline

#3 Remo

Remo

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 136 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:29 AM

right on track. we will retrace about 80% of ydays decline


Well......

I was kinda leaning on the other side and meant that we're now completing or yesterday completed the 2nd wave and are heading back up :D

#4 eminimee

eminimee

    I don't care who's fur is flying...

  • TT Member
  • 14,307 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:33 AM

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$COMPQ&p=D&yr=8&mn=6&dy=0&i=p83712504730&a=74866467&r=4324.png

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=$SPX&p=60&yr=0&mn=6&dy=10&i=p01887485676&a=104926928&r=644.png

#5 Remo

Remo

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 136 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:46 AM

Thanks Tea, why do you presume we're on a symmetrical triangle instead of having just completed regular zig-zag? Edit: Sorry, I just noticed that you just presented 2 different options on the chart :)

Edited by Remo, 29 August 2007 - 06:51 AM.


#6 eminimee

eminimee

    I don't care who's fur is flying...

  • TT Member
  • 14,307 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 06:54 AM

I favour the breakout to new highs and not the tri... but tri is possible....but not if we bottomed a C wave of an expanded flat at the 1370 lows, which I think we did.

#7 LarryT

LarryT

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 1,066 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 08:15 AM

I favour the breakout to new highs and not the tri... but tri is possible....but not if we bottomed a C wave of an expanded flat at the 1370 lows, which I think we did.


I think it was a wave "c" flat also for a larger "B" wave from 2006 low. Target is C = A at 1605 SP-500
"If you are going to be dumb you gotta be tough"

Twitter site

d:^)

#8 eminimee

eminimee

    I don't care who's fur is flying...

  • TT Member
  • 14,307 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 08:19 AM

Larry...very close...I have a target of 1608 from a different method...the biggy first targets for me is 736 then 747 OEX.

#9 blustar

blustar

    blustar

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 6,220 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 08:30 AM

Instead of wave 2, how 'bout wave b of a-b-c rally? Still wave c is a third wave but no 4-5 waves.

Blessings,

 

blu

BluStar Market Insights Subscriptions