Jump to content



Photo

1987 snowball down 2.34%, 5.16%, 20.47%


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#11 IndexTrader

IndexTrader

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 7,694 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 11:05 AM

I do know that dollar was dropping in 1987. And if I recall
Fed had reduced rates ( I am not certain about that).


Rates had been cut three times before Oct. 19, 1987.

The thing to get about interest rates now versus 1987 is not the percentages themselves but, where they are going. If the Fed brings the Fed rate down further, the dollar, which is already historically low versus other currencies, goes even lower. That raises inflation which means the Fed will have to raise rates IF a low inflation economy is really Bernake's main concern. The cost of oil is going to be inflationary as it is.

If short term rates go down, long term rates go up. Mortgage rates go up, those pre-foreclosure folks can't sell their homes because there are less buyers, more foreclosures, bigger drop in home prices for all, more defaulting CDO's etc., etc.,...well, you get the picture. It goes round and round spreading debt and default exponentially in a spiral of death.

Have a nice day! :)


I think the idea here is to lower rates in an attempt to pump things up, then raise rates later as the economy firms in order to fight inflation. Kind of like threading a needle admittedly...I'm not saying it will work or not. But I think that's the attempt. And too, I think they may be worrying about the affects of the real estate market, and what impact that will ultimately bring later on. Amidst those concerns I would imagine that the dollar takes a back seat...if it ever had a front seat.

Will mortgage rates go up? They are going down right now. Is oil inflationary? So far the answer is no. I mean, let's face it, oil has gone from 20 to 90 without an increase in the inflation numbers. And too, to the extent that we are concerned about adjustable rate mortgages and their resets, you want short rates lower since that's what the resets are based on.

Might be interesting to know what your suggestion is....raise rates into a slowing economy? That's been the prescription for a crises every time it's been tried.

IT

Edited by IndexTrader, 20 October 2007 - 11:07 AM.


#12 securelstmile

securelstmile

    Member

  • Banned
  • 2,603 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 11:25 AM

Was there a sub-prime problem in 1987? Is there one now?

There was a building savings and loan problem, as well as insider trading and other security fraud problems (Ivan Boesky) which eventually led to the down fall of Michael Milken and his junk bond fiasco's involving corporate financings and mergers and acquisitions ("takeovers").

Were derivatives in the Trillion dollar magnitude present then?

No, but there was a new fangled thing called "program trading".

Was Al-qaeda strong in 1987?

Well, it was forming at that time. But Iran and Iraq were fighting, and besides the USS Stark being attacked, the Iranians were having scrimmages with the US with oil platforms in the Strait of Hormuz. And let's not forget the Iran-Contra affair and Yasser Arafat.

Did a 911 style terror attack happen before 1987?

Remember the bombing of the barracks in Lebanon in 1983 that killed 300 peace keepers (courtesy of Hezbollah)?

Was US involved in a $400 Billion/year war in 1987?

Yes, it was called the "Cold War", though you can't account for inflation...."Peace through Strength"

I do know that dollar was dropping in 1987. And if I recall Fed had reduced rates

The US Dollar was declining for 2 1/2 years from 1985 and found a temporary bottom with the stock market bottom in December 1987. Alan Greenspan became FED chief in early August of 1987 and promptly raised interest rates to slow the "irrational" stock market advance. In fact, if I remember correctly, we had one or two limit down days in the bond pit right after his appointment which eventually pushed the yield on the 30 year bond to 9 1/4%. The 3 month T-Bill yield moved up from around 6% and kept pushing higher to around 7 1/2% in mid October before the market couldn't take it anymore and crashed. To this day, many believe that AG was the final straw that broke the back of the advance which ended on August 25, and the rest is, as they say, is history. His repeat performance in 1999/2000 proved that economists never do learn from their mistakes.

So, yes, nothing really changes in this play called market analysis, only the players and circumstances.

Fib



Fib,

Did you see the CNBC special on the 87 crash? Greenspan is interviewed along with a few other players of the time. I swear he comes across as having been completely out to lunch during that crash. He talks about being on a plane the day of the crash, and getting off the plane to hear that the market had went down 500 points. His response was, "How many points?"

How could he have gotten on that plane when all the market players knew something really bad was about to happen, yet, it seemes as though he had no idea.

Greenspan is smirking while discussing these events, others spoke about the day as one which they remember with great fear. It was really interesting, and I thought quite telling.

I have never been a Greenspan hater or fan but just thought that I caught some real insight into his complete naiviety in dealing with that particular crisis.
The harder I work, the luckier I get.

#13 fib_1618

fib_1618

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 10,145 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 02:36 PM

Did you see the CNBC special on the 87 crash? Greenspan is interviewed along with a few other players of the time. I swear he comes across as having been completely out to lunch during that crash. He talks about being on a plane the day of the crash, and getting off the plane to hear that the market had went down 500 points. His response was, "How many points?"...Greenspan is smirking while discussing these events, others spoke about the day as one which they remember with great fear.

I'm not surprised by his reaction, but it does make you wonder if his reaction would had been the same if the Dow was below 1000 instead of being above 10,000 right now. As for myself, I was inside Mt. Shasta caverns during that day. When we left the hotel room, the market had opened down 200 points and I figured we were close to some sort of exhaustion. I still remember coming back to the hotel room after our outing and turning on Lou Dobbs and how shocked and sad he was...and then I found out why. My reaction was pretty much the same as AG..."How many points"?

How could he have gotten on that plane when all the market players knew something really bad was about to happen, yet, it seems as though he had no idea.

Believe me when I tell you that no one had a clue on what was about to occur. Sure, the market was getting progressively more shaky after the 10/6 top, but no one was expecting what actually happened in the last 2 hours of trading that day...it was just overwhelming, relentless. You also have to remember that we traded over 600,000,000 shares on the big board and this was before the days of computer tickets. The average daily volume at that time was somewhere around 200,000,000 shares. The back rooms were pretty much there all night after the close trying to match up the buy and sell tickets. It was actually the next day when the panic level was at its highest when the CBOE and CME decided to suspend all trading.

You can see how the two days unfolded with the chart shown below.

As far as watching "the show", for some reason, I had no real interest. Instead, I watched "Survivor". ;)

Fib

Posted Image

Better to ignore me than abhor me.

“Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it” - Benjamin Franklin

 

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw

 

Demagogue: A leader who makes use of popular prejudices, false claims and promises in order to gain power.

Technical Watch Subscriptions



 


#14 pdx5

pdx5

    I want return OF my money more than return ON my money

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9,530 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 03:41 PM

Were derivatives in the Trillion dollar magnitude present then?

No, but there was a new fangled thing called "program trading".

Was Al-qaeda strong in 1987?

Well, it was forming at that time. But Iran and Iraq were fighting, and besides the USS Stark being attacked, the Iranians were having scrimmages with the US with oil platforms in the Strait of Hormuz. And let's not forget the Iran-Contra affair and Yasser Arafat.

Did a 911 style terror attack happen before 1987?

Remember the bombing of the barracks in Lebanon in 1983 that killed 300 peace keepers (courtesy of Hezbollah)?

Was US involved in a $400 Billion/year war in 1987?

Yes, it was called the "Cold War", though you can't account for inflation...."Peace through Strength"

I do know that dollar was dropping in 1987. And if I recall Fed had reduced rates

The US Dollar was declining for 2 1/2 years from 1985 and found a temporary bottom with the stock market bottom in December 1987. Alan Greenspan became FED chief in early August of 1987 and promptly raised interest rates to slow the "irrational" stock market advance. In fact, if I remember correctly, we had one or two limit down days in the bond pit right after his appointment which eventually pushed the yield on the 30 year bond to 9 1/4%. The 3 month T-Bill yield moved up from around 6% and kept pushing higher to around 7 1/2% in mid October before the market couldn't take it anymore and crashed. To this day, many believe that AG was the final straw that broke the back of the advance which ended on August 25, and the rest is, as they say, is history. His repeat performance in 1999/2000 proved that economists never do learn from their mistakes.

So, yes, nothing really changes in this play called market analysis, only the players and circumstances.

Fib


"Money cannot consistently be made trading every day or every week during the year." ~ Jesse Livermore Trading Rule

#15 Doug

Doug

    Member

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 78 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 04:16 PM

From time to time in various posts here when a downturn in the market is predicted by one contributor or another, someone invariably replies that we should hide in the basement, head for the hills or bar the doors. I profit in up markets. I profit in down markets and I profit in markets that go nowhere. That is our business - to profit in the market - any market.

It doesn't matter where the train is going or how fast as long as you are on the train.

Regards,


#16 emdee

emdee

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 161 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 04:48 PM

Is oil inflationary? So far the answer is no. I mean, let's face it, oil has gone from 20 to 90 without an increase in the inflation numbers.


IT,

No offense but I don't know how anyone cannot see the inflation that has taken place as a direct result of the price of oil. Oil is priced into virtually everything. Of course there hasn't been an increase in the inflation numbers that are provided courtesy of our government. Cost of living increases for those on social security are based on those numbers, and they are an absolute farce imo largely because of that. Do you think they are going to give those folks 10% increases just to keep up with their rising cost of living?

Fwiw...Mike

#17 milbank

milbank

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 4,714 posts

Posted 20 October 2007 - 06:09 PM

I do know that dollar was dropping in 1987. And if I recall
Fed had reduced rates ( I am not certain about that).


Rates had been cut three times before Oct. 19, 1987.

The thing to get about interest rates now versus 1987 is not the percentages themselves but, where they are going. If the Fed brings the Fed rate down further, the dollar, which is already historically low versus other currencies, goes even lower. That raises inflation which means the Fed will have to raise rates IF a low inflation economy is really Bernake's main concern. The cost of oil is going to be inflationary as it is.

If short term rates go down, long term rates go up. Mortgage rates go up, those pre-foreclosure folks can't sell their homes because there are less buyers, more foreclosures, bigger drop in home prices for all, more defaulting CDO's etc., etc.,...well, you get the picture. It goes round and round spreading debt and default exponentially in a spiral of death.

Have a nice day! :)


I think the idea here is to lower rates in an attempt to pump things up, then raise rates later as the economy firms in order to fight inflation. Kind of like threading a needle admittedly...I'm not saying it will work or not. But I think that's the attempt. And too, I think they may be worrying about the affects of the real estate market, and what impact that will ultimately bring later on. Amidst those concerns I would imagine that the dollar takes a back seat...if it ever had a front seat.

Will mortgage rates go up? They are going down right now. Is oil inflationary? So far the answer is no. I mean, let's face it, oil has gone from 20 to 90 without an increase in the inflation numbers. And too, to the extent that we are concerned about adjustable rate mortgages and their resets, you want short rates lower since that's what the resets are based on.

Might be interesting to know what your suggestion is....raise rates into a slowing economy? That's been the prescription for a crises every time it's been tried.

IT



In re to Bernake's, I almost described it in the post above as "dancing on a razor blade" and then decided to edit it. Unless he lowers rates to at most 3.75%, as Bill Gross at PIMCO wants, and holds them there a while, the rate lowering is not really going to do much. Right now it's more of a political mollification to the Wall Street crowd that isn't really going to do much substantially for the credit problem. It's certainly not going to help the subprime lenders. Nor will it help the sub-prime borrower since the drop in value of their home precludes them from being able to refi into a fixed mortgage anyway. Another quarter to half percent cut isn't going to do it either. It did pop the equity markets but, that's going to be, like in 1987 even though circumstances were specifically different, a problem for the general market shortly if not already.
At the two banks I use for following mortgage rates (30-year fixed), Wells Fargo and Citibank, the rates have been going either one-eighth up or one-eighth down for almost a year now. Not much change. Yesterday's change at Wells, down to 6.25 is the lowest I recall seeing it for all of 2007. Still, houses in many parts of the country are going down due to a lack of qualified (non-subprime) borrowers and foreclosures.

Gas at the pump has not reflected the jump in oil prices lately because reserves have gone up. It will soon though and IF the Turks cross the Iraqi border to go after the Kurds as they seem to be spoiling to do, I expect oil to go up 20% per barrel no matter what price it is at gas at the pump will reflect it as well. I expect to see gas going up to at least $3.75-3.90 by Christmas. Also, this winter, according to many almanacs, is going to be one of the coldest in some time, heating oil will be selling higher to those who haven't already set their contracts I expect. I'm not that well versed in how that works though.

Due to the way the government figures inflation, CSRS retirees just got a COLA raise of 2.3%, FERS, 2%. FECA COLA might come in at 3.4% but, that will not be known until January. How much do you see only going up 3.4% this year at your grocery store? I've been seeing beef, dairy and produce going up more than that in the northeast.

My suggestion as to what to do? I don't know. I do know there is going to be a lot of pain due to irresponsible lending. That our standing in the international economic community is going to suffer greatly due to these CDO's we've sold to them which are worth less and less everyday with every foreclosure even though nobody knows what they are actually worth. That those who are responsible savers are already being penalized in their money markets by those who borrowed irresponsibly. That the money markets themselves could conceivably go under due to the fact that some of them hold collapsing ABCP.

From time to time in various posts here when a downturn in the market is predicted by one contributor or another, someone invariably replies that we should hide in the basement, head for the hills or bar the doors. I profit in up markets. I profit in down markets and I profit in markets that go nowhere. That is our business - to profit in the market - any market.

It doesn't matter where the train is going or how fast as long as you are on the train.

Regards,



Of course Doug. nothing I've posted about this weekend has anything to do with the trading I do Monday through Friday from 9 to 4. It does have something to do with what I do with some of my earnings in my personal life (See: my earlier post regarding potato chips. See: my post on the Price Of Beer thread :D ) This is just, for anyone posting on these types of threads, intellectual stimulation, or masturbastion if you prefer. :Light:

Edited by milbank, 20 October 2007 - 06:18 PM.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
--George Bernard Shaw


"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free."
--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


#18 pdx5

pdx5

    I want return OF my money more than return ON my money

  • Traders-Talk User
  • 9,530 posts

Posted 21 October 2007 - 12:16 AM

From time to time in various posts here when a downturn in the market is predicted by one contributor or another, someone invariably replies that we should hide in the basement, head for the hills or bar the doors. I profit in up markets. I profit in down markets and I profit in markets that go nowhere. That is our business - to profit in the market - any market.

It doesn't matter where the train is going or how fast as long as you are on the train.

Regards,


Doug, I have no clue what age bracket you are in, but for folks such as me who
are retired or close to retirement it is not a wise policy to trade 100% bull or bear
at any one time. We have accumulated considerable net worth and depend on it
to sustain us through our non-working years. Therefore a good chunk of it is in LT
investments. It would be fool-hardy for us to try to time the market with everything
we got. I trade with no more than 33% of my holdings. And I never go short anymore.
It is either long or money market. The other 67% is in core positions, all long.
Which is why I am always interested in the LT direction of economy & stocks.

But I can entirely see your point in your trading style. In my 20's & 30's and even 40's
I did pretty much the same thing.

Best, pdx
"Money cannot consistently be made trading every day or every week during the year." ~ Jesse Livermore Trading Rule

#19 IndexTrader

IndexTrader

    Member

  • TT Patron+
  • 7,694 posts

Posted 21 October 2007 - 01:54 AM

Is oil inflationary? So far the answer is no. I mean, let's face it, oil has gone from 20 to 90 without an increase in the inflation numbers.


IT,

No offense but I don't know how anyone cannot see the inflation that has taken place as a direct result of the price of oil. Oil is priced into virtually everything. Of course there hasn't been an increase in the inflation numbers that are provided courtesy of our government. Cost of living increases for those on social security are based on those numbers, and they are an absolute farce imo largely because of that. Do you think they are going to give those folks 10% increases just to keep up with their rising cost of living?

Fwiw...Mike


Actually, I think the numbers are pretty close to right on. You're giving an example of oil....which is of course used in other products. And so it is clear that some types of products have had signficant price increases. You're taking that one example, and extrapolating it into an inflation theory, and then further suggesting that the government is lying to everyone about it in order to take advantage of retirees.

Let me give you a different example. I own some rentals. One of my apartments is in the CPI. So I've got a government guy who calls me once in a while to find out what my rent is doing. My rent has been flat now for several years in that particular apartment. Obviously, that offsets something else. And if I extrapolated from that one thing, I would be able to theorize that inflation is 0.

The point is that when everything is taken into account, I think the government numbers are pretty close to right. Yes, oil is up, food is up, commodities are up. Techology is down. Now we got real estate moving down.

By the way, I doubt the government is out to misreport numbers, mislead anyone, or that there is any conspiracy theory.

IT

Edited by IndexTrader, 21 October 2007 - 01:56 AM.


#20 emdee

emdee

    Member

  • TT Member+
  • 161 posts

Posted 21 October 2007 - 05:57 AM

By the way, I doubt the government is out to misreport numbers, mislead anyone, or that there is any conspiracy theory.


Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts.