Hmmm...I never knew that Fibonacci was a God...maybe to some, I guess.if you want to use EMAs, why not use God's numbers...8,13,34 etc....
But to your point, there is a marked difference of character and cadence between the creation of fuel (internals) and the output it provides to drive prices (externals), so it would make sense to use analytical tools and time periods that would best fit to measure these functions. For many, this is where the "science" part of technical analysis comes into play, and many will probably agree that the use of Fibonacci time periods tend to work their best magic in trying to measure fuel consumption as opposed to time periods that have a better association to economic fundamental and/or cyclical work of which prices represent.
Although there is no mistake that cosmic forces play a large part in who we all are as life (human or otherwise) on this planet (gravitational and geothermal physics and such), my experience with the use of astrology, as it strictly pertains to market analysis, is really best left up to the eye of the beholder very much like any other analysis....if you allow your bias get in the way of your analytical prowess, it does become no more than an exercise in futility.Do you believe in astrology?Thanks for taking the time in putting the post together.
That said, I think we all do appreciate the time and effort Brad took in putting the post together whether we find it beneficial or not.
Fib