https://pbs.twimg.co...UMVVUAAAgZf.jpg
Posted 27 August 2016 - 08:52 PM
Posted 28 August 2016 - 09:57 PM
Posted 29 August 2016 - 05:01 AM
russian is rubbish if you dont understand the language eh? if ewave was rubbish i would not have won timer digest timer of the year 17 times
My first foray into the TA world (beyond basic John Murphy etc) was with EW theory according to Prechter. The problem with the whole thing as I learned with time is just that, the method does not deal with time appropriately. And when I see wave counts with really short wave 2s and 4s, my eyes just glaze over. It's rubbish.
Posted 29 August 2016 - 02:25 PM
My first foray into the TA world (beyond basic John Murphy etc) was with EW theory according to Prechter. The problem with the whole thing as I learned with time is just that, the method does not deal with time appropriately. And when I see wave counts with really short wave 2s and 4s, my eyes just glaze over. It's rubbish.
YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, SilentOne!!!
Posted 30 August 2016 - 12:14 PM
russian is rubbish if you dont understand the language eh? if ewave was rubbish i would not have won timer digest timer of the year 17 times
My first foray into the TA world (beyond basic John Murphy etc) was with EW theory according to Prechter. The problem with the whole thing as I learned with time is just that, the method does not deal with time appropriately. And when I see wave counts with really short wave 2s and 4s, my eyes just glaze over. It's rubbish.
Good.....but pay attention because now we have the count you describe with that ''finally somebody gets the message ewave wise'' so that we can control it over the time..........
By the way I perfectly know who the count' s author is
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard
Posted 30 August 2016 - 03:21 PM
Edited by Iblayz, 30 August 2016 - 03:21 PM.
Posted 30 August 2016 - 09:41 PM
And da_chief gave the author credit in the tag line of the thread header. He wasn't stealing from anybody.
No one said he was stealing anything from anybody....what I said is that now we know the count he is basing his analysis on and we can see over the time how effective the fabulous Elliott's theory is.
forever and only a V-E-N-E-T-K-E-N - langbard