"So here's the template:
"It's bad but better than expected."
Previous report was revised, but ignore that now.
Ignore the fact that it was a holiday and unemployment offices were closed.
http://www.traders-t...?...&hl=jobless
So today we read:
http://www.nasdaq.co...asp?cust=nasdaqLabor Day caused a bump in the jobless claims series. Initial claims in the September 18 week, which doesn't include Labor Day, rose 12,000 to a higher-than-expected 465,000. The prior week, which includes Labor Day, was revised 3,000 higher to 453,000. Adjustments factor in a low level of filings for the shortened week and a high level in the following week as government offices catch up on the work. But the back-up this year exceeded the adjustments, making for the surprise gain and raising questions on how much initial claims are actually improving.
Here's what "they" said after the previous holiday shortened report:
"Finally, jobless claims show solid improvement. Initial claims fell 21,000 in the July 3 week to 454,000 for the lowest level since early May. (prior week revised 3,000 higher to 475,000).
The best weekly improvement since early May... though the level is still slightly higher than a month ago.
Yet conclusions are difficult to draw given possible calendar and seasonal effects tied to the July 4 holiday"
Then on July 22nd we read: "The Labor Department confesses: it was holiday distortions tied to July 4 that held down initial claims in the prior week."
So here's the template:
"It's bad but better than expected."
Previous report was revised, but ignore that now.
Ignore the fact that it was a holiday and unemployment offices were closed.
Edited by Rogerdodger, 23 September 2010 - 08:24 AM.