Private Banking
#1
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:52 PM
Of course who could expect to keep a job and keep this going to
fruition? I am beginning this on March 1 to finish up a couple obligations
before starting this big time, all in.
The book is Becoming Your Own Banker by Nelson Nash.
He runs an example how much better someone could have been by
putting 4 years of college tuition into this program instead
of paying to become a W2 wage slave.
Here is a couple links to see what it is about.
The book is about a 2 hour read.
A video series is a little long and excessive for this audience, there are other
resources available on the internet.
http://www.youtube.c...I...03F&index=1
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#2
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:51 AM
Who is getting rich with such programs? You guessed it, the insurance salesperson.
" This has been around for decades, but apparently is now being remarketed as “Infinite Banking”, “Bottomless Banking” among other catchy names."
"So with be-your-own-banker, you borrow from yourself accumulating the interest tax free. Obviously there is a catch. The first hurdle is that every policy has multiple fees built into it. One fee is called the “mortality charge” which is the actuarial cost to insure your life. Think of it as the cost of term insurance- the pure cost to protect against early death, only the policy pays at any age so the mortality charge is much higher than with term insurance which expires. The second hurdle is that WL policies have other fees built into the policy like admin costs which essentially amount to profits for the insurance company. Total fees are usually higher in the early years of the policy too because the insurer has to recoup sales costs. All of these fees and costs mean that the policy will take 7-10 years typically to “break even”. That is, it takes 7-10 years of payments before the earnings on the accumulated cash value are large enough to pay the premium so you don’t have to. Think of it like a bank account- it has to have a large enough balance to earn enough interest to pay some bills. Instead of making up numbers for the sake of this article, I have asked an insurance broker I know to provide a quote for a plain-vanilla $100,000 whole life policy on a 40-year old healthy non-smoking male. This policy has a fixed annual premium of $887. Such policies provide projections or “illustrations” estimating future performance. This particular policy accumulates cash value of $7,070 in year 10 at current rates (read: not reliable) of 4.7% and just $4,500 at the guaranteed minimum returns promised. A little quick math shows that $887 invested at 4.7% each year will compound to $11,001 in ten years. But what about the $100k of insurance coverage you get in addition to the cash value? Well, a 30-year term life policy for $100k might cost around $150 per year, so compounding $737 instead of $887 gets you $9,141- still far outpacing the policy. At this rate, it is going to take a long time to have enough in the policy to buy a car. In fact, it will take until year 22 to have $20,000 available.
Let’s say we accelerate this process and put $5,000 per year into the policy in addition to the $887 premium. I backed into the mortality charges and so was able to calculate a cash value of $24,000 after year 4. Now, we can borrow $20,000 from ourselves via the policy to buy a car and “be our own banker”. Recall that we have to pay the money back, with interest, to the policy. Assuming a 6% rate and a 5 year “loan” to ourselves, we pay $4748 for 5 years plus the regular $887 premium.
At the end of year 9, the loan is paid back and our policy is worth $35,283, which doesn’t seem so bad or is it? Remember, we paid $5,887 into the policy for 4 years, then $5,527 for another five years. This works out to a negative 9.5% annual return! Total paid in: $51,183; ending value: 35,283.
Perhaps most surprisingly, this compares ok with the “traditional” way of doing things: Term life for $150, invest the $5,737 at the same 4.7% for the first four years, then take a traditional loan for the $20,000 at 6% (while the first four years continues to compound). When all is said and done, you end up paying or saving $47,288 and having $32,428. The annual return on the traditional program works out to -9.2% annually- slightly better than the be your own banker system. So who is getting rich with such programs? You guessed it, the insurance salesperson.
http://thelongrunblo...our-own-banker/
Edited by Rogerdodger, 13 December 2012 - 12:55 AM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#3
Posted 13 December 2012 - 10:25 PM
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#4
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:12 PM
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#5
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:41 PM
I think it's obvious that the majority have no plan except to go to Walmart and spend every dime.
Keep us informed if it works as you hope, or doesn't.
Friday's Consumer Credit Report
Consumers are active borrowers with credit outstanding, up $14.2 billion, up sharply for a third month in row. Much of the gain is once again tied to loans for students who, limited by the soft jobs market, continue to stay in school. Strong sales of autos are also driving up borrowing. Student and auto loans are part of the nonrevolving component which is up $10.8 billion in the month. The revolving side, where credit cards are tracked, popped up $3.4 billion following the prior month's $2.2 billion decline. Willingness to borrow money and willingness to make big ticket commitments like auto purchases are good signs for the holiday shopping season.
Chart: http://anasdaq.econo...p?imageid=23660
Edited by Rogerdodger, 13 December 2012 - 11:43 PM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.
#6
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:37 AM
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#7
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:49 PM
Edited by AChartist, 01 February 2013 - 12:51 PM.
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#8
Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:01 PM
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#9
Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:38 PM
life and deposit into annuity.
I elaborated in another thread, the conspiracy behind spending allowances found in both
the irs form 433A and the Chapter 13 Means Test.
Here is a scenerio how it can happen.
These are 10 agendas. This is a few months old but nothing different has occured.
This was excellent, Farage composition. This is about what they have planned for us?
Now they won't do it overnight targeting different vulnerabilities, ultimately they
can take every middle income soul into bankruptcy to the end of taking all property.
And how is this done, job losses,
inflation, falling incomes, more directly devastating taxation and obviated by O-care.
The whole life is a spending allowance and exempt property, the annuity is exempt property
but not a spending allowance.
I would suggest there is not much time, about 2014 tv (s)elections. whom MSNBC has already
selected hillary, what one has accomplished in spending allowance modification and
exempt property by then, may be last chance.
So I have been gutting budget, disposing of property.
It only takes 2-3 months of operating expenses in the whole life and vitually 100% of income
can be contracted into more whole life, excess cash in whole life deposited to annuity, and one
is completely exempt and safe as long as they have income. 2014 really won't be enough time
for me but I'll be ahead of doing nothing.
My basic principals have been
Do not contract with them
Do make exempt contracts only, whole life and annuity
Only work in the Mutual companies
401k is fraud
Ultimately get 100% of income contracted into whole life
Secondly, fund annuity with excess whole life cash accumulation
It is a balance and risk of allocation for excess cash toward policy self sufficiency of future premiums,
and to allocation to annuity for income.
I have yet to locate an offshore source and I'm not ready for that. The
major Mutuals in Delaware, NY, Mass., are the elite money and may be the protected
class, where a company in Belize may get the Cyprus treatment as a tax haven.
I am probably going to get liscensed in this, but not seriously while I am working full time
but may ease into it.
I have talked to several agents and none get it, except the first guy who I worked with
who specializes in this, and I am going back to him for my third policy in about 3 months,
following some foundations I am laying now. It is alot of stress.
Ultimately you learn that everything that does not go into this is waste, everything, and that
kind of makes you sick to change paradigm which is a self awareness that everything before
was fraud.
Edited by AChartist, 13 April 2013 - 09:44 PM.
"marxism-lennonism-communism always fails and never worked, because I know
some of them, and they don't work" M.Jordan
#10
Posted 13 April 2013 - 10:33 PM
ultimately they can take every middle income soul into bankruptcy to the end of taking all property.
And how is this done, job losses, inflation, falling incomes, more directly devastating taxation and obviated by O-care.
everything before was fraud.
And I thought I was cynical about the current state of affairs...
“Every ounce of my cynicism is supported by historical precedent.”
― Glen Cook, Shadow Games
“The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.”
― Tom Waits, The Early Years: The Lyrics, 1971-1983
Edited by Rogerdodger, 13 April 2013 - 10:40 PM.
BIGGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL EVER...Official records systematically 'adjusted'.