http://www.siliconin...f the epicenter
2010
#2
Posted 27 January 2018 - 02:17 PM
It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of
the primary wave 3.
#3
Posted 27 January 2018 - 02:43 PM
It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of
the primary wave 3.
guess again where do you think primary 2 ended
#4
Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:09 PM
It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of
the primary wave 3.
guess again where do you think primary 2 ended
1932 ?
#5
Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:37 PM
Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.
http://elliottwavepr...rly-6-19-15.png
#6
Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:55 PM
I guess this is still 1 of 3 of 3 with wave 2 maybe starting up around INDU 100k.
#7
Posted 28 January 2018 - 01:58 PM
I guess this is still 1 of 3 of 3 with wave 2 maybe starting up around INDU 100k.
now ur getting close....good wirk
#8
Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:00 PM
Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.
Here is a link to a count I found. If I'm right about 1932, looks like you are counting 2000 as 5 of 1 of 3 instead of 5 of 3 of 3.
there is only 1 correct count......and that aint it.....watch the sky
#9
Posted 28 January 2018 - 02:02 PM
It does appear to be a 3 of 3 type move with the parabolic type advance. I guess you are using 1974 or 1982 as the start of
the primary wave 3.
guess again where do you think primary 2 ended
1932 ?
2009